Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25271627›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2014

HIV-specific humoral responses benefit from stronger prime in phase Ib clinical trial.

Pierre-Alexandre Bart, Yunda Huang, Shelly T Karuna, Samuel Chappuis, Julien Gaillard, Nidhi Kochar, Xiaoying Shen, Mary A Allen, Song Ding, John Hural and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00961883 (A Phase 1b Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Heterologous Prime/Boost Vaccine Regimens), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00961883 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1b Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Heterologous Prime/Boost Vaccine Regimens (NYVAC-B/rAd5 vs. rAd5/NYVAC-B) in Healthy, HIV-1 Uninfected, Ad5 Seronegative Adult Participants

TypeinterventionalSponsorHIV Vaccine Trials NetworkRan2009Enrolled80ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsNYVAC-B, Placebo, rAd5
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Impact of TJournal of virology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Pierre-Alexandre Bart
Yunda Huang
Shelly T Karuna
Samuel Chappuis
Julien Gaillard
Nidhi Kochar
Xiaoying Shen
Mary A Allen
Song Ding
John Hural
Hua-Xin Liao
Barton F Haynes
Barney S Graham
Peter B Gilbert
M Juliana McElrath
David C Montefiori
Georgia D Tomaras
Giuseppe Pantaleo
Nicole Frahm

Funding

LOC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068614 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Dan H. Barouch, Lawrence Corey · 2011 to 2026
$1175.6M
LC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068618 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Margaret Juliana McElrath · 2011 to 2026
$483.6M
SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
Leadership Group for a Global HIV Vaccine Clinical Trials NetworkU01AI068614 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI COREY, LAWRENCE · 2006 to 2010
$181.5M
Leadership for HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Networks; HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkU01AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SELF, STEVEN G. · 2006 to 2010
$53.8M
Seattle Vaccine Trials UnitUM1AI069481 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Rachel Ann Bender Ignacio, Margaret Juliana McElrath · 2012 to 2026
$24.4M
South-West European HIV Vaccine Clinical Trial UnitU01AI069443 · NIAID · CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE VAUDOIS · PI PANTALEO, GIUSEPPE · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
South-West European HIV Vaccine Clinical Trial UnitUM1AI069443 · NIAID · CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE VAUDOIS · PI PANTALEO, GIUSEPPE · 2012 to 2013
$744k
NIAID NIH HHS AI068614NIAID NIH HHS AI068635NIAID NIH HHS AI069443NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068614NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068635NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069443NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068614NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068618NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI068618NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069443NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI069481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Vector prime-boost immunization strategies induce strong cellular and humoral immune responses. We examined the priming dose and administration order of heterologous vectors in HIV Vaccine Trials Network 078 (HVTN 078), a randomized, double-blind phase Ib clinical trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost regimens, with a New York vaccinia HIV clade B (NYVAC-B) vaccine and a recombinant adenovirus 5-vectored (rAd5-vectored) vaccine. METHODS. NYVAC-B included HIV-1 clade B Gag-Pol-Nef and gp120, while rAd5 included HIV-1 clade B Gag-Pol and clades A, B, and C gp140. Eighty Ad5-seronegative subjects were randomized to receive 2 × NYVAC-B followed by 1 × 1010 PFU rAd5 (NYVAC/Ad5hi); 1 × 108 PFU rAd5 followed by 2 × NYVAC-B (Ad5lo/NYVAC); 1 × 109 PFU rAd5 followed by 2 × NYVAC-B (Ad5med/NYVAC); 1 × 1010 PFU rAd5 followed by 2 × NYVAC-B (Ad5hi/NYVAC); or placebo. Immune responses were assessed 2 weeks after the final vaccination. Intracellular cytokine staining measured T cells producing IFN-γ and/or IL-2; cross-clade and epitope-specific binding antibodies were determined; and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) were assessed with 6 tier 1 viruses. RESULTS. CD4+ T cell response rates ranged from 42.9% to 93.3%. NYVAC/Ad5hi response rates (P ≤ 0.01) and magnitudes (P ≤ 0.03) were significantly lower than those of other groups. CD8+ T cell response rates ranged from 65.5% to 85.7%. NYVAC/Ad5hi magnitudes were significantly lower than those of other groups (P ≤ 0.04). IgG response rates to the group M consensus gp140 were 89.7% for NYVAC/Ad5hi and 21.4%, 84.6%, and 100% for Ad5lo/NYVAC, Ad5med/NYVAC, and Ad5hi/NYVAC, respectively, and were similar for other vaccine proteins. Overall nAb responses were low, but aggregate responses appeared stronger for Ad5med/NYVAC and Ad5hi/NYVAC than for NYVAC/Ad5hi. CONCLUSIONS. rAd5 prime followed by NYVAC boost is superior to the reverse regimen for both vaccine-induced cellular and humoral immune responses. Higher Ad5 priming doses significantly increased binding and nAbs. These data provide a basis for optimizing the design of future clinical trials testing vector-based heterologous prime-boost strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00961883. FUNDING. NIAID, NIH UM1AI068618, AI068635, AI068614, and AI069443.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdultAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralCells, CulturedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin GMaleProtein BindingAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID25271627
PMCPMC4347219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.