'If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change'*.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Proliferation of gynaecological scientific societies and their financial transparency: an Italian survey.BMJ open · 2016
   Article
2. If we want things to change, we need to eliminate commercial conflicts of interest.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  If we want things to change, we need to eliminate commercial conflicts of interest.2015

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as