Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25271162›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

Kinetics of cellobiohydrolase (Cel7A) variants with lowered substrate affinity.

Jeppe Kari, Johan Olsen, Kim Borch, Nicolaj Cruys-Bagger, Kenneth Jensen, Peter Westh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Single-molecule tracking reveals dual front door/back door inhibition of Cel7A cellulase by its product cellobiose.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Engineering cellulases for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Removal ofBiotechnology for biofuels · 2020
    Article
  20. The dissociation mechanism of processive cellulases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeppe KariFrom Department of Science, Systems and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, Roskilde University, 1 Universitetsvej, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and.
Johan OlsenFrom Department of Science, Systems and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, Roskilde University, 1 Universitetsvej, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and.
Kim BorchNovozymes A/S, Krogshøjvej 36, Bagsværd DK-2880, Denmark.
Nicolaj Cruys-BaggerFrom Department of Science, Systems and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, Roskilde University, 1 Universitetsvej, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and.
Kenneth JensenNovozymes A/S, Krogshøjvej 36, Bagsværd DK-2880, Denmark.
Peter WesthFrom Department of Science, Systems and Models, Research Unit for Functional Biomaterials, Roskilde University, 1 Universitetsvej, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark and pwesth@ruc.dk.
Roskilde University · DKNovozymes (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellobiohydrolases are exo-active glycosyl hydrolases that processively convert cellulose to soluble sugars, typically cellobiose. They effectively break down crystalline cellulose and make up a major component in industrial enzyme mixtures used for deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass. Identification of the rate-limiting step for cellobiohydrolases remains controversial, and recent reports have alternately suggested either association (on-rate) or dissociation (off-rate) as the overall bottleneck. Obviously, this uncertainty hampers both fundamental mechanistic understanding and rational design of enzymes with improved industrial applicability. To elucidate the role of on- and off-rates, respectively, on the overall kinetics, we have expressed a variant in which a tryptophan residue (Trp-38) in the middle of the active tunnel has been replaced with an alanine. This mutation weakens complex formation, and the population of substrate-bound W38A was only about half of the wild type. Nevertheless, the maximal, steady-state rate was twice as high for the variant enzyme. It is argued that these opposite effects on binding and activity can be reconciled if the rate-limiting step is after the catalysis (i.e. in the dissociation process).

Indexed as

MutationAlanineAmino Acid SubstitutionBinding, CompetitiveBinding SitesBiocatalysisCatalytic DomainCellobioseCelluloseCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseFungal ProteinsKineticsModels, MolecularProtein BindingSubstrate SpecificityThermodynamicsAlanineCellobioseCelluloseCellulose 1,4-beta-CellobiosidaseFungal ProteinsTryptophanBiodegradationBiofuelCellobiohydrolaseCelluloseCrystalline Cellulose DegradationEnzyme KineticsTrichoderma reesei

Identifiers

PMID25271162
PMCPMC4239601
OpenAlexW2084828551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.