Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25271160›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

Mutational analysis of cysteine residues of the insect odorant co-receptor (Orco) from Drosophila melanogaster reveals differential effects on agonist- and odorant-tuning receptor-dependent activation.

Rebecca M Turner, Stephen L Derryberry, Brijesh N Kumar, Thomas Brittain, Laurence J Zwiebel, Richard D Newcomb, David L Christie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca M TurnerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Stephen L DerryberryDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, and.
Brijesh N KumarSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Thomas BrittainSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Laurence J ZwiebelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, and.
Richard D NewcombSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand,; Plant & Food Research, Private Bag 92169, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
David L ChristieSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand,. Electronic address: d.christie@auckland.ac.nz.
University of Auckland · NZVanderbilt University · USPlant & Food Research · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insect odorant receptors are heteromeric odorant-gated cation channels comprising a conventional odorant-sensitive tuning receptor (ORx) and a highly conserved co-receptor known as Orco. Orco is found only in insects, and very little is known about its structure and the mechanism leading to channel activation. In the absence of an ORx, Orco forms homomeric channels that can be activated by a synthetic agonist, VUAA1. Drosophila melanogaster Orco (DmelOrco) contains eight cysteine amino acid residues, six of which are highly conserved. In this study, we replaced individual cysteine residues with serine or alanine and expressed Orco mutants in Flp-In 293 T-Rex cells. Changes in intracellular Ca(2+) levels were used to determine responses to VUAA1. Replacement of two cysteines (Cys-429 and Cys-449) in a predicted intracellular loop (ICL3), individually or together, gave variants that all showed similar increases in the rate of response and sensitivity to VUAA1 compared with wild-type DmelOrco. Kinetic modeling indicated that the response of the Orco mutants to VUAA1 was faster than wild-type Orco. The enhanced sensitivity and faster response of the Cys mutants was confirmed by whole-cell voltage clamp electrophysiology. In contrast to the results from direct agonist activation of Orco, the two cysteine replacement mutants when co-expressed with a tuning receptor (DmelOR22a) showed an ∼10-fold decrease in potency for activation by 2-methyl hexanoate. Our work has shown that intracellular loop 3 is important for Orco channel activation. Importantly, this study also suggests differences in the structural requirements for the activation of homomeric and heteromeric Orco channel complexes.

Indexed as

MutationOdorantsAllosteric SiteAnimalsBiotinylationCalciumCysteineDNA Mutational AnalysisDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEpitopesHEK293 CellsHumansIon ChannelsKineticsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedCalciumCysteineDrosophila ProteinsEpitopesIon ChannelsN-(4-ethylphenyl)-2-((4-ethyl-5-(3-pyridinyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)thio)acetamideOR22a protein, DrosophilaOrco protein, DrosophilaReceptors, OdorantThioglycolatesTriazoles7-Helix Ligand-gated ChannelChannel ActivationCysteine ResiduesInsectIon ChannelMutagenesisNeurobiologyOlfactionReceptor Structure-Function

Identifiers

PMID25271160
PMCPMC4231661
OpenAlexW1976067397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.