ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014
Mutational analysis of cysteine residues of the insect odorant co-receptor (Orco) from Drosophila melanogaster reveals differential effects on agonist- and odorant-tuning receptor-dependent activation.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- The chemosensory world of mosquitoes: olfactory receptors and their role in blocking mosquito-borne disease transmission.Parasites & vectors · 2025Review
- Alternative strategies based on transgenic Drosophila melanogaster for the functional characterization of insect Ionotropic Receptors.Biological research · 2025Article
- Elucidation of the structural basis for ligand binding and translocation in conserved insect odorant receptor co-receptors.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Heterologous investigation of metabotropic and ionotropic odorant receptors in ab3A neurons ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Review
- Altered functional properties of the codling moth Orco mutagenized in the intracellular loop-3.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Endogenous insensitivity to the Orco agonist VUAA1 reveals novel olfactory receptor complex properties in the specialist fly Mayetiola destructor.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Article
- Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Olfactory Receptor Co-Receptor Orco Orthologs Among Five Mirid Bug Species.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Expressional and functional interactions of twoPeerJ · 2018Article
- Current Status on the Functional Characterization of Chemosensory Receptors ofFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
- Chemosensory adaptations of the mountain fly Drosophila nigrosparsa (Insecta: Diptera) through genomics' and structural biology's lenses.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Candidate pheromone receptors of codling moth Cydia pomonella respond to pheromones and kairomones.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Functional analysis of Orco and odorant receptors in odor recognition in Aedes albopictus.Parasites & vectors · 2016Article
- The full repertoire of Drosophila gustatory receptors for detecting an aversive compound.Nature communications · 2015Article
- Amino acid coevolution reveals three-dimensional structure and functional domains of insect odorant receptors.Nature communications · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Insect odorant receptors are heteromeric odorant-gated cation channels comprising a conventional odorant-sensitive tuning receptor (ORx) and a highly conserved co-receptor known as Orco. Orco is found only in insects, and very little is known about its structure and the mechanism leading to channel activation. In the absence of an ORx, Orco forms homomeric channels that can be activated by a synthetic agonist, VUAA1. Drosophila melanogaster Orco (DmelOrco) contains eight cysteine amino acid residues, six of which are highly conserved. In this study, we replaced individual cysteine residues with serine or alanine and expressed Orco mutants in Flp-In 293 T-Rex cells. Changes in intracellular Ca(2+) levels were used to determine responses to VUAA1. Replacement of two cysteines (Cys-429 and Cys-449) in a predicted intracellular loop (ICL3), individually or together, gave variants that all showed similar increases in the rate of response and sensitivity to VUAA1 compared with wild-type DmelOrco. Kinetic modeling indicated that the response of the Orco mutants to VUAA1 was faster than wild-type Orco. The enhanced sensitivity and faster response of the Cys mutants was confirmed by whole-cell voltage clamp electrophysiology. In contrast to the results from direct agonist activation of Orco, the two cysteine replacement mutants when co-expressed with a tuning receptor (DmelOR22a) showed an ∼10-fold decrease in potency for activation by 2-methyl hexanoate. Our work has shown that intracellular loop 3 is important for Orco channel activation. Importantly, this study also suggests differences in the structural requirements for the activation of homomeric and heteromeric Orco channel complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.