ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2015
Hypoxic guard systems do not prevent rapid hypoxic inspired mixture formation.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- More on the danger of inhaling air at reduced fresh gas flows: a self-experiment.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2016Article
- Performance of an active inspired hypoxic guard.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2016Article
- Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2015 end of year summary: anesthesia.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because a case report and theoretical mass balances suggested that hypoxic guard systems may not prevent the formation of hypoxic inspired mixtures (FIO2 ≤ 21 %) over the clinically used fresh gas flow (FGF) range, we measured FIO2 over a wide range of hypoxic guard limits for O2/N2O and O2/air mixtures. After IRB approval, 16 ASA I-II patients received sevoflurane in either O2/N2O (n = 8) or O2/air (n = 8) using a Zeus(®) anesthesia machine in the conventional mode. After using an 8 L/min FGF with FDO2 = 25% for 10 min, the following hypoxic guard limits were tested for 4 min each, expressed as [total FGF in L/min; FDO2 in %]: [0.3;85], [0.4;65], [0.5;50], [0.7;36], [0.85;30], [1.0;25], [1.25;25], [1.5;25], [2;25], [3;25], [5;25], and [8;25]. In between these [FGF;FDO2] combinations, 8 L/min FGF with 25% O2 was used for 4 min to return to the same baseline FIO2 (25%) before the start of the next combination. This sequence was studied once in each patient receiving O2/air (n = 8), but twice in each patient who received O2/N2O (n = 8) to examine the effect of decreasing N2O uptake over time, resulting in three groups: early O2/N2O, late O2/N2O, and O2/air group. The [FGF;FDO2]-FIO2 relationship was examined. The overall [FGF;FDO2]-FIO2 relationship in the three groups was similar. In all 1, 1.25, and 1.5 L/min FGF groups, FIO2 decreased below 21% in all but one patient; this occurred within 1 min in at least one patient. In the 0.7 L/min O2/air group and the 3 L/min late O2/N2O and O2/air groups, FIO2 decreased below 21% in one patient. Current hypoxic guard systems do not reliably prevent a hypoxic FIO2 with O2/N2O and O2/air mixtures, particularly between 0.7 and 3 L/min.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25270987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.