Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25270858›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2014

Beyond the 'dyad': a qualitative re-evaluation of the changing clinical consultation.

Deborah Swinglehurst, Celia Roberts, Shuangyu Li, Orest Weber, Pascal Singy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A computer template to enhance patient-centredness in multimorbidity reviews: a qualitative evaluation in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Recovering the self: a manifesto for primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Deborah SwinglehurstCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.
Celia RobertsDepartment of Education and Professional Studies, King's College London, London, UK.
Shuangyu LiDivision of Medical Education, School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Orest WeberPsychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pascal SingyPsychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
King's College School · GBUniversity of Lausanne · CHQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health RDA/03/07/076Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify characteristics of consultations that do not conform to the traditionally understood communication 'dyad', in order to highlight implications for medical education and develop a reflective 'toolkit' for use by medical practitioners and educators in the analysis of consultations.

designA series of interdisciplinary research workshops spanning 12 months explored the social impact of globalisation and computerisation on the clinical consultation, focusing specifically on contemporary challenges to the clinician-patient dyad. Researchers presented detailed case studies of consultations, taken from their recent research projects. Drawing on concepts from applied sociolinguistics, further analysis of selected case studies prompted the identification of key emergent themes.

settingUniversity departments in the UK and Switzerland.

participantsSix researchers with backgrounds in medicine, applied linguistics, sociolinguistics and medical education. One workshop was also attended by PhD students conducting research on healthcare interactions.

resultsThe contemporary consultation is characterised by a multiplicity of voices. Incorporation of additional voices in the consultation creates new forms of order (and disorder) in the interaction. The roles 'clinician' and 'patient' are blurred as they become increasingly distributed between different participants. These new consultation arrangements make new demands on clinicians, which lie beyond the scope of most educational programmes for clinical communication.

conclusionsThe consultation is changing. Traditional consultation models that assume a 'dyadic' consultation do not adequately incorporate the realities of many contemporary consultations. A paradox emerges between the need to manage consultations in a 'super-diverse' multilingual society, while also attending to increasing requirements for standardised protocol-driven approaches to care prompted by computer use. The tension between standardisation and flexibility requires addressing in educational contexts. Drawing on concepts from applied sociolinguistics and the findings of these research observations, the authors offer a reflective 'toolkit' of questions to ask of the consultation in the context of enquiry-based learning.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsCommunicationEducationEducation, MedicalHumansLinguisticsQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID25270858
PMCPMC4179418
OpenAlexW2126508196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.