Trial reportHNO2014
[Chronic complex tinnitus: does day care unit-based short-term psychotherapy help?].
Trial report in HNO, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence and evidence gaps in tinnitus therapy.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResults of empirical research on the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic treatment of chronic complex tinnitus are still unclear and require further studies for clarification.
objectiveThe objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of multimodal treatment of patients with chronic complex tinnitus in a day care unit setting. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn this prospective study, the effectiveness of an intense 5-day multimodal treatment delivered to 93 patients was assessed using a pre-post design. Tinnitus-specific effects were captured by the Mini-TQ-12 measurement instrument and psychiatric comorbidity assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). In statistical analyses, t-tests, χ(2) tests and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were performed to determine statistical significance; effect sizes (ES) were calculated according to Cohen's d.
resultsThe pre-post difference in Mini-TQ-12 was highly significant in t-test (p < 0.001); the ES was small (ES = 0.45). In BSI, the pre-post difference in the Global Severity Index (GSI) as a global measure was also highly significant in t-test (p < 0.001); ES was small (ES = 0.40). Nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon test) confirmed these results.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the statistically significant effectiveness of a multimodal therapeutic approach. Moreover, the results indicate that patients could benefit from more intensive therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.