Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25270621›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2014

Ninety-day oral toxicity studies on two genetically modified maize MON810 varieties in Wistar Han RCC rats (EU 7th Framework Programme project GRACE).

Dagmar Zeljenková, Katarína Ambrušová, Mária Bartušová, Anton Kebis, Jevgenij Kovrižnych, Zora Krivošíková, Miroslava Kuricová, Aurélia Líšková, Eva Rollerová, Viera Spustová and 24 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advancing human health risk assessment.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Dagmar ZeljenkováSlovak Medical University, Limbová 12, 83303, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Katarína Ambrušová
Mária Bartušová
Anton Kebis
Jevgenij Kovrižnych
Zora Krivošíková
Miroslava Kuricová
Aurélia Líšková
Eva Rollerová
Viera Spustová
Elena Szabová
Jana Tulinská
Soňa Wimmerová
Mikuláš Levkut
Viera Révajová
Zuzana Ševčíková
Kerstin Schmidt
Jörg Schmidtke
Jose Luis La Paz
Maria Corujo
Maria Pla
Gijs A Kleter
Esther J Kok
Jutta Sharbati
Carlos Hanisch
Ralf Einspanier
Karine Adel-Patient
Jean-Michel Wal
Armin Spök
Annette Pöting
Christian Kohl
Ralf Wilhelm
Joachim Schiemann
Pablo Steinberg
Slovak Medical University · SKFreie Universität Berlin · DEJulius Kühn-Institut · DECenter for Research in Agricultural Genomics · ESWageningen University & Research · NLCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRFederal Institute for Risk Assessment · DEInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MAInterdisciplinary Research Centre for Technology, Work and Culture · ATUniversity of Girona · ESUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The GMO Risk Assessment and Communication of Evidence (GRACE; www.grace-fp7.eu ) project is funded by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme. A key objective of GRACE is to conduct 90-day animal feeding trials, animal studies with an extended time frame as well as analytical, in vitro and in silico studies on genetically modified (GM) maize in order to comparatively evaluate their use in GM plant risk assessment. In the present study, the results of two 90-day feeding trials with two different GM maize MON810 varieties, their near-isogenic non-GM varieties and four additional conventional maize varieties are presented. The feeding trials were performed by taking into account the guidance for such studies published by the EFSA Scientific Committee in 2011 and the OECD Test Guideline 408. The results obtained show that the MON810 maize at a level of up to 33 % in the diet did not induce adverse effects in male and female Wistar Han RCC rats after subchronic exposure, independently of the two different genetic backgrounds of the event.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAdministration, OralAnimalsBody WeightConsumer Product SafetyDietFemaleFood, Genetically ModifiedMaleOrgan SizePlants, Genetically ModifiedRats, Inbred StrainsResearch DesignRisk AssessmentToxicity Tests, SubchronicZea mays

Identifiers

PMID25270621
PMCPMC4247492
OpenAlexW2048837612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.