Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25270378›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2014

A determinant of odorant specificity is located at the extracellular loop 2-transmembrane domain 4 interface of an Anopheles gambiae odorant receptor subunit.

David T Hughes, Guirong Wang, Laurence J Zwiebel, Charles W Luetje

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Odorant ReceptorInsects · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A tale of two copies: Evolutionary trajectories of moth pheromone receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Characterization ofInsects · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

David T HughesDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101, USA and Present address: University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13001 E. 17th Place, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Guirong WangDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA Present address: State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Laurence J ZwiebelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Charles W LuetjeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101, USA and cluetje@med.miami.edu.
University of Miami · USInstitute of Plant Protection · CNVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Examination of Odorant Receptors in Vector MosquitoesR01AI056402 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ZWIEBEL, LAURENCE J · 2003 to 2013
$4.0M
Synapses,Channels, and Transduction in NeuroscienceT32NS007044 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MULLER, KENNETH J · 1985 to 2010
$2.2M
Binding Site Structure of Insect Odorant Receptors.R01DC011091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LUETJE, CHARLES WARD · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI056402NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011091NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the structural basis for odorant specificity in odorant receptors of the human malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, odorant-binding subunits (Agam\Ors) expressed in Xenopus oocytes in combination with Agam\Orco (coreceptor subunit) were assayed by 2-electrode voltage clamp against 25 structurally related odorants. Agam\Or13 and Agam\Or15 display 82% amino acid identity and had similar, but somewhat distinct odorant response profiles. The ratio of acetophenone to 4-methylphenol responses was used in a mutation-based analysis of Agam\Or15, interchanging 37 disparate residues between Agam\Or15 and Agam\Or13. Eleven mutations caused significant changes in odorant responsiveness. Mutation of alanine 195 resulted in the largest shift in response ratio from Agam\Or15 toward Agam\Or13. Concentration-response analysis for a series of mutations of residue 195 revealed a large effect on acetophenone sensitivity, with EC50 values varying by >1800-fold and correlating with residue side chain length. Similar results were obtained for propiophenone and benzaldehyde. But, for other odorants, such as 4-methylphenol, 4-methylbenzaldehyde, and 4-methylpropiophenone, the effect of mutation was much smaller (EC50 values varied by ≤16-fold). These results show that alanine 195, putatively located at the second extracellular loop/fourth transmembrane domain interface, plays a critical role in determining the odorant response specificity of Agam\Or15.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnophelesCells, CulturedGene ExpressionInsect ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataMutationOdorantsProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, OdorantSmellXenopusInsect ProteinsReceptors, OdorantelectrophysiologyinsectolfactionreceptorstructureXenopus oocytes

Identifiers

PMID25270378
PMCPMC4201304
OpenAlexW2331597309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.