ArticleOecologia2014
The dilemma of foraging herbivores: dealing with food and fear.
Article in Oecologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of FTIR Spectra for Classifying Plant Items in a Vertebrate Herbivore's Diet.Journal of chemical ecology · 2026Article
- Proximity to Humans Reduces Distance to Foraging Sites by Aardvarks.Zoological studies · 2026Article
- Nutritional missed opportunity costs: wild house mice (Mus musculus) consistently consume less preferred food, with implications for control.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Large-scale surveys of woodrats (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Density-dependent resource partitioning of temperate large herbivore populations under rewilding.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025Article
- Resolving anxiety-like behaviour inconsistencies in the elevated plus maze by tracking exploration depth and timing.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Seasonal indices of nutrition and stress in a northern population of snowshoe hares.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2025Article
- Population Dynamics and the Microbiome in a Wild Boreal Mammal: The Snowshoe Hare Cycle and Impacts of Diet, Season and Predation Risk.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- How often are ecosystems top-down controlled? Experiments in grassland, grasshopper, and bird systems over time and space.Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) · 2024Article
- Dining in danger: Resolving adaptive fish behavior increases realism of modeled ecosystem dynamics.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- DNA metabarcoding analysis of the bare-nosed wombat (Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Predation risk and floral rewards: How pollinators balance these conflicts and the consequences on plant fitness.Current research in insect science · 2024Review
- Niche overlap across landscape variability in summer between two large herbivores using eDNA metabarcoding.PloS one · 2024Article
- Badgers remain fearless in the face of simulated wolf presence near their setts.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Nutritional needs and mortality risk combine to shape foraging decisions in ants.Current zoology · 2023Article
- Refining the stress gradient hypothesis for mixed species groups of African mammals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Wolf risk fails to inspire fear in two mesocarnivores suggesting facilitation prevails.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Evaluating the summer landscapes of predation risk and forage quality for elk (Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Validation of an Enzyme Immunoassay to Measure Faecal Glucocorticoid Metabolites in Common Brushtail Possums (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For foraging herbivores, both food quality and predation risk vary across the landscape. Animals should avoid low-quality food patches in favour of high-quality ones, and seek safe patches while avoiding risky ones. Herbivores often face the foraging dilemma, however, of choosing between high-quality food in risky places or low-quality food in safe places. Here, we explore how and why the interaction between food quality and predation risk affects foraging decisions of mammalian herbivores, focusing on browsers confronting plant toxins in a landscape of fear. We draw together themes of plant-herbivore and predator-prey interactions, and the roles of animal ecophysiology, behaviour and personality. The response of herbivores to the dual costs of food and fear depends on the interplay of physiology and behaviour. We discuss detoxification physiology in dealing with plant toxins, and stress physiology associated with perceived predation risk. We argue that behaviour is the interface enabling herbivores to stay or quit food patches in response to their physiological tolerance to these risks. We hypothesise that generalist and specialist herbivores perceive the relative costs of plant defence and predation risk differently and intra-specifically, individuals with different personalities and physiologies should do so too, creating individualised landscapes of food and fear. We explore the ecological significance and emergent impacts of these individual-based foraging outcomes on populations and communities, and offer predictions that can be clearly tested. In doing so, we provide an integrated platform advancing herbivore foraging theory with food quality and predation risk at its core.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.