Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25270076›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2015

Cyclosporin a and rapamycin relieve distinct lentiviral restriction blocks in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.

Carolina Petrillo, Daniela Cesana, Francesco Piras, Sara Bartolaccini, Luigi Naldini, Eugenio Montini, Anna Kajaste-Rudnitski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Removal of innate immune barriers allows efficient transduction of quiescent human hematopoietic stem cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina Petrillo1] Division of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy [2] Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy [3] San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene therapy (TIGET), Milan, Italy.
Daniela Cesana1] Division of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy [2] San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene therapy (TIGET), Milan, Italy.
Francesco PirasDivision of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Sara BartolacciniDivision of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Luigi Naldini1] Division of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy [2] Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy [3] San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene therapy (TIGET), Milan, Italy.
Eugenio Montini1] Division of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy [2] San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene therapy (TIGET), Milan, Italy.
Anna Kajaste-Rudnitski1] Division of Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cells and Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy [2] San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene therapy (TIGET), Milan, Italy.
The San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

European Research Council 249845Telethon TGT11D01Telethon TGT11D02Telethon TGT11D04Telethon TGTGSK08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) permissiveness to HIV-derived lentiviral vectors (LVs) remains a challenge for the field of gene therapy as high vector doses and prolonged ex vivo culture are still required to achieve clinically relevant transduction levels. We report here that Cyclosporin A (CsA) and Rapamycin (Rapa) significantly improve LV gene transfer in human and murine HSPC. Both compounds increased LV but not gammaretroviral transduction and acted independently of calcineurin and autophagy. Improved gene transfer was achieved across all CD34(+) subpopulations, including in long-term SCID repopulating cells. Effects of CsA were specific of HSPC and opposite to its known impact on HIV replication. Mutating the Cyclophilin A binding pocket of the viral capsid (CA) further improved transduction in combination with CsA. Tracking of the LV genome fate revealed that CsA relieves a CA-dependent early block and increases integration, while Rapa acts early in LV infection independently of the viral CA. In agreement, only Rapa was able to improve transduction by an integrase-defective LV harboring wild-type CA. Overall, our findings pave the way for more efficient and sustainable LV gene therapy in human HSPCs and shed light on the multiple innate barriers specifically hampering LV transduction in these cells.

Indexed as

Transduction, GeneticAnimalsCell DifferentiationCyclosporineFetal BloodGene ExpressionGenetic VectorsGraft SurvivalHematopoietic Stem CellsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunophenotypingLentivirusMicePhenotypeSirolimusCyclosporineSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID25270076
PMCPMC4312494
OpenAlexW2056721303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.