Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25269751›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2015

Periosteum: characteristic imaging findings with emphasis on radiologic-pathologic comparisons.

Damien Bisseret, Rachid Kaci, Marie-Hélène Lafage-Proust, Marianne Alison, Caroline Parlier-Cuau, Jean-Denis Laredo, Valérie Bousson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Melorheostotic Bone Lesions Caused by Somatic Mutations in MAP2K1 Have Deteriorated Microarchitecture and Periosteal Reaction.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ultrasound features of periosteal abnormalities in children.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ultrasound imaging of bone fractures.Insights into imaging · 2022
    Review
  17. Computed tomography features of discospondylitis in dogs.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Damien BisseretService de Radiologie Ostéo-Articulaire, Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2 Rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010, Paris, France, damien.bisseret@free.fr.
Rachid Kaci
Marie-Hélène Lafage-Proust
Marianne Alison
Caroline Parlier-Cuau
Jean-Denis Laredo
Valérie Bousson
Délégation Paris 7 · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Lariboisière · FRInserm · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The periosteum covers most bone structures. It has an outer fibrous layer and an inner cambial layer that exhibits osteogenic activity. The periosteum is a dynamic structure that plays a major role in bone modeling and remodeling under normal conditions. In several disorders such as infections, benign and malignant tumors, and systemic diseases, the osteogenic potential of the periosteum is stimulated and new bone is produced. The newly formed bone added onto the surface of the cortex adopts various configurations depending on the modalities and pace of bone production. Our aim here is to describe the anatomy, histology, and physiology of the periosteum and to review the various patterns of periosteal reaction with emphasis on relations between radiological and histopathological findings. A careful evaluation of the periosteal reaction and appearance of the underlying cortex, in combination with the MRI, clinical, and laboratory data, provides valuable information on lesion duration and aggressiveness, thereby assisting in the etiological diagnosis and optimizing patient management. A solid reaction strongly suggests a benign and slow-growing process that gives the bone enough time to wall off the lesion. Single lamellar reactions occur in acute and usually benign diseases. Multilamellar reactions are associated with intermediate aggressiveness and a growth rate close to the limit of the walling-off capabilities of the bone. Spiculated, interrupted, and complex combined reactions carry the worst prognosis, as they occur in the most aggressive and fast-growing diseases: the periosteum attempts to create new bone but is overwhelmed and may be breached.

Indexed as

HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOsteoarthritisPeriosteumPeriostitisTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID25269751
OpenAlexW1980878646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.