Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25268692›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2015

Influenza surveillance in animals: what is our capacity to detect emerging influenza viruses with zoonotic potential?

S VON Dobschuetz, M DE Nardi, K A Harris, O Munoz, A C Breed, B Wieland, G Dauphin, J Lubroth, K D C Stärk, FLURISK Consortium

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Weighing serological evidence of human exposure to animal influenza viruses - a literature review.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S VON DobschuetzRoyal Veterinary College (RVC),London,UK.
M DE NardiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie,OIE/FAO and National Reference Laboratory for Newcastle Disease and Avian Influenza,OIE Collaborating Centre for Diseases at the Human-Animal Interface,Legnaro,Padova,Italy.
K A HarrisAnimal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA),EU/OIE/FAO and National Reference Laboratory for Newcastle Disease and Avian Influenza,National Reference Laboratory for Swine Influenza,Surrey,UK.
O MunozIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie,OIE/FAO and National Reference Laboratory for Newcastle Disease and Avian Influenza,OIE Collaborating Centre for Diseases at the Human-Animal Interface,Legnaro,Padova,Italy.
A C BreedAnimal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA),EU/OIE/FAO and National Reference Laboratory for Newcastle Disease and Avian Influenza,National Reference Laboratory for Swine Influenza,Surrey,UK.
B WielandRoyal Veterinary College (RVC),London,UK.
G DauphinFood and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO),Rome,Italy.
J LubrothFood and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO),Rome,Italy.
K D C StärkRoyal Veterinary College (RVC),London,UK.
FLURISK Consortium
Royal Veterinary College · GBAnimal and Plant Health Agency · GBFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · ITIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A survey of national animal influenza surveillance programmes was conducted to assess the current capacity to detect influenza viruses with zoonotic potential in animals (i.e. those influenza viruses that can be naturally transmitted between animals and humans) at regional and global levels. Information on 587 animal influenza surveillance system components was collected for 99 countries from Chief Veterinary Officers (CVOs) (n = 94) and published literature. Less than 1% (n = 4) of these components were specifically aimed at detecting influenza viruses with pandemic potential in animals (i.e. those influenza viruses that are capable of causing epidemic spread in human populations over large geographical regions or worldwide), which would have zoonotic potential as a prerequisite. Those countries that sought to detect influenza viruses with pandemic potential searched for such viruses exclusively in domestic pigs. This work shows the global need for increasing surveillance that targets potentially zoonotic influenza viruses in relevant animal species.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInfluenza, HumanOrthomyxoviridaeOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsSus scrofaZoonosesEmerging infectionsinfluenza Apandemicsurveillancesurveillance system

Identifiers

PMID25268692
PMCPMC9506977
OpenAlexW2155638849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.