Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25268625›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Hope for GWAS: relevant risk genes uncovered from GWAS statistical noise.

Catarina Correia, Yoan Diekmann, Astrid M Vicente, José B Pereira-Leal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Catarina CorreiaInstituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Av. Padre Cruz, Lisboa 1649-016, Portugal. ccorreia@igc.gulbenkian.pt.
Yoan DiekmannInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal. ydiekmann@igc.gulbenkian.pt.
Astrid M VicenteInstituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Av. Padre Cruz, Lisboa 1649-016, Portugal. astrid.vicente@insa.min-saude.pt.
José B Pereira-LealInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156, Portugal. jleal@igc.gulbenkian.pt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hundreds of genetic variants have been associated to common diseases through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), yet there are limits to current approaches in detecting true small effect risk variants against a background of false positive findings. Here we addressed the missing heritability problem, aiming to test whether there are indeed risk variants within GWAS statistical noise and to develop a systematic strategy to retrieve these hidden variants. Employing an integrative approach, which combines protein-protein interactions with association data from GWAS for 6 common diseases, we found that associated-genes at less stringent significance levels (p < 0.1) with any of these diseases are functionally connected beyond noise expectation. This functional coherence was used to identify disease-relevant subnetworks, which were shown to be enriched in known genes, outperforming the selection of top GWAS genes. As a proof of principle, we applied this approach to breast cancer, supporting well-known breast cancer genes, while pinpointing novel susceptibility genes for experimental validation. This study reinforces the idea that GWAS are under-analyzed and that missing heritability is rather hidden. It extends the use of protein networks to reveal this missing heritability, thus leveraging the large investment in GWAS that produced so far little tangible gain.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyModels, StatisticalBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein Interaction Maps

Identifiers

PMID25268625
PMCPMC4227180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.