Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25268369›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

The impact of low-grade toxicity in older people with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

T Kalsi, G Babic-Illman, P Fields, S Hughes, N Maisey, P Ross, Y Wang, D Harari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Effects of a Geriatric Assessment Intervention on Patient-Reported Symptomatic Toxicity in Older Adults With Advanced Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Association of frailty with chemotherapy toxicity in chemotherapy-naive older patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

T Kalsi1] POPS-GOLD, Department of Ageing & Health, Ground floor Bermondsey Wing, Guys Hospital, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK [2] Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD, UK.
G Babic-IllmanPOPS-GOLD, Department of Ageing & Health, Ground floor Bermondsey Wing, Guys Hospital, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
P FieldsDepartment of Haematology, Guys Hospital, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
S HughesDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Guys Hospital, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
N MaiseyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guys Hospital, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
P RossDepartment of Medical Oncology, Guys Hospital, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Y WangDivision of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD, UK.
D Harari1] POPS-GOLD, Department of Ageing & Health, Ground floor Bermondsey Wing, Guys Hospital, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK [2] Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant toxicity in chemotherapy trials is usually defined as grade ⩾3. In clinical practice, however, multiple lower grade toxicities are often considered meaningful. The purpose of this observational cohort study was to identify which level of toxicity triggers treatment modification and early discontinuation of chemotherapy in older people.

methodsPatients aged 65+ were recruited in a central London hospital. A total of 108 patients were recruited at the start of new chemotherapy treatment between October 2010 and July 2012.

resultsMean age was 72.1 ± 5 years, median 72 and range 65-86 years. Of the patients, 50.9% (55) were male with gastrointestinal (49), gynaecological (18), lung (15) and other cancers (26). Chemotherapy was palliative in 59.3% (64/108), curative/ neoadjuvant/adjuvant in the others. Mean number of cycles completed was 4.2 ± 3. Treatment modifications due to toxicity occurred in 60 (55.6%) patients, 35% (21/60) of whom had no greater than grade 2 toxicity. Early treatment discontinuation because of toxicity occurred in 23 patients (21.3%), 39.1% (9/23) of whom had no greater than grade 2 toxicity.

conclusionsMany older patients did not complete treatment as planned. Treatment was modified/discontinued even for one or two low-grade toxicities. Further work is required to clarify whether low-grade toxicity has a greater clinical impact in older people, or whether clinicians have a lower threshold for modifying/discontinuing treatment in older people.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25268369
PMCPMC4264435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.