Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25268228›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

CT-based attenuation correction in I-123-ioflupane SPECT.

Catharina Lange, Anita Seese, Sarah Schwarzenböck, Karen Steinhoff, Bert Umland-Seidler, Bernd J Krause, Winfried Brenner, Osama Sabri, Jens Kurth, Swen Hesse and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization of open-source BSREM reconstruction forPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Confirmation ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catharina LangeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anita SeeseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sarah SchwarzenböckDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Karen SteinhoffDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Bert Umland-SeidlerGE Healthcare Buchler GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, Germany.
Bernd J KrauseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Winfried BrennerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Osama SabriDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Jens KurthDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Swen HesseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ralph BuchertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
University Hospital Leipzig · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAttenuation correction (AC) based on low-dose computed tomography (CT) could be more accurate in brain single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) than the widely used Chang method, and, therefore, has the potential to improve both semi-quantitative analysis and visual image interpretation. The present study evaluated CT-based AC for dopamine transporter SPECT with I-123-ioflupane. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-two consecutive patients in whom I-123-ioflupane SPECT including low-dose CT had been performed were recruited retrospectively at 3 centres. For each patient, 3 different SPECT images were reconstructed: without AC, with Chang AC and with CT-based AC. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) images were obtained by scaling voxel intensities using the whole brain without striata as reference. For assessing the impact of AC on semi-quantitative analysis, specific-to-background ratios (SBR) in caudate and putamen were obtained by fully automated SPM8-based region of interest (ROI) analysis and tested for their diagnostic power using receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) analysis. For assessing the impact of AC on visual image reading, screenshots of stereotactically normalized DVR images presented in randomized order were interpreted independently by two raters at each centre.

resultsCT-based AC resulted in intermediate SBRs about half way between no AC and Chang. Maximum area under the ROC curve was achieved by the putamen SBR, with negligible impact of AC (0.924, 0.935 and 0.938 for no, CT-based and Chang AC). Diagnostic accuracy of visual interpretation also did not depend on AC.

conclusionsThe impact of CT-based versus Chang AC on the interpretation of I-123-ioflupane SPECT is negligible. Therefore, CT-based AC cannot be recommended for routine use in clinical patient care, not least because of the additional radiation exposure.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAgedBrainHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIodine RadioisotopesMiddle AgedNortropanesParkinsonian DisordersRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedIodine RadioisotopesioflupaneNortropanes

Identifiers

PMID25268228
PMCPMC4182457
OpenAlexW2079808285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.