ReviewCancers2014
The future of glioblastoma therapy: synergism of standard of care and immunotherapy.
Review in Cancers, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic Value of YKL-40 in Patients with Glioblastoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Molecular neurobiology · 2017Pooled it
- Radiation-induced lymphopenia: A data compilation to unveil relevant factors and mitigation strategies.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Emerging trends in cell-based therapies: contemporary advances and ethical considerations in translational neurosurgical oncology.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Prognostic and predictive determinants in high-grade gliomas: integrating tumor-intrinsic biology with patient and system-level factors.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Biomarkers of immunotherapy in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Review
- Could the combination of immunotherapy and target therapy be a potential double edge sword for glioblastoma treatment? A correspondence.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Characterization of the Response of 9L and U-251N Orthotopic Brain Tumors to 3D Conformal Radiation Therapy.Radiation research · 2023Article
- A review on lymphocyte radiosensitivity and its impact on radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Nanoparticle designs for delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics as brain cancer therapies.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021Review
- Dendritic Cells and Cancer Immunotherapy: The Adjuvant Effect.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Insights into Multifunctional Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Glioblastoma Treatment.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Extracellular Matrix Proteins Confer Cell Adhesion-Mediated Drug Resistance Through Integrin αFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- GL261 luciferase-expressing cells elicit an anti-tumor immune response: an evaluation of murine glioma models.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Intratumor injection of CCL21-coupled vault nanoparticles is associated with reduction in tumor volume in an in vivo model of glioma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Phospho-valproic acid (MDC-1112) suppresses glioblastoma growth in preclinical models through the inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation.Carcinogenesis · 2019Article
- Immunotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas: A Clinical Update and Practical Considerations for Neurosurgeons.World neurosurgery · 2019Review
- Sulforaphane from Cruciferous Vegetables: Recent Advances to Improve Glioblastoma Treatment.Nutrients · 2018Review
- Viability of glioblastoma stem cells is effectively reduced by diisothiocyanate-derived mercapturic acids.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Aberrant methylation and silencing of the SPINT2 gene in high-grade gliomas.Cancer science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) is maximal surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ). As the 5-year survival with GBM remains at a dismal <10%, novel therapies are needed. Immunotherapies such as the dendritic cell (DC) vaccine, heat shock protein vaccines, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFRvIII) vaccines have shown encouraging results in clinical trials, and have demonstrated synergistic effects with conventional therapeutics resulting in ongoing phase III trials. Chemoradiation has been shown to have synergistic effects when used in combination with immunotherapy. Cytotoxic ionizing radiation is known to trigger pro-inflammatory signaling cascades and immune activation secondary to cell death, which can then be exploited by immunotherapies. The future of GBM therapeutics will involve finding the place for immunotherapy in the current treatment regimen with a focus on developing strategies. Here, we review current GBM therapy and the evidence for combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors, DC and peptide vaccines with the current standard of care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.