Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25267843›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2014

Chevron formation of the zebrafish muscle segments.

Fabian Rost, Christina Eugster, Christian Schröter, Andrew C Oates, Lutz Brusch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The role of geometry in morphogenesis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Molecular regulation of myocyte fusion.Current topics in developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Shaping the zebrafish myotome by intertissue friction and active stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The Developmental Phases of Zebrafish Myogenesis.Journal of developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  9. CaDevelopmental biology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Delta-Notch signalling in segmentation.Arthropod structure & development · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabian RostCenter for Information Services and High-Performance Computing, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Christina EugsterMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Christian SchröterMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Andrew C OatesMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, 01307 Dresden, Germany MRC-National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Lutz BruschCenter for Information Services and High-Performance Computing, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany lutz.brusch@tu-dresden.de.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1202/3Wellcome Trust 098025Wellcome Trust WT098025MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The muscle segments of fish have a folded shape, termed a chevron, which is thought to be optimal for the undulating body movements of swimming. However, the mechanism shaping the chevron during embryogenesis is not understood. Here, we used time-lapse microscopy of developing zebrafish embryos spanning the entire somitogenesis period to quantify the dynamics of chevron shape development. By comparing such time courses with the start of movements in wildtype zebrafish and analysing immobile mutants, we show that the previously implicated body movements do not play a role in chevron formation. Further, the monotonic increase of chevron angle along the anteroposterior axis revealed by our data constrains or rules out possible contributions by previously proposed mechanisms. In particular, we found that muscle pioneers are not required for chevron formation. We put forward a tension-and-resistance mechanism involving interactions between intra-segmental tension and segment boundaries. To evaluate this mechanism, we derived and analysed a mechanical model of a chain of contractile and resisting elements. The predictions of this model were verified by comparison with experimental data. Altogether, our results support the notion that a simple physical mechanism suffices to self-organize the observed spatiotemporal pattern in chevron formation.

Indexed as

AnimalsIn Situ HybridizationModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalMuscle TonusSomitesTime-Lapse ImagingVeratrum AlkaloidsZebrafishcyclopamineVeratrum AlkaloidsBiomechanical modelDevelopmentMorphogenesisMyotomeQuantitative analysisTeleost

Identifiers

PMID25267843
PMCPMC4213178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.