Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25267789›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2014

Quantitative detection of human spermatogonia for optimization of spermatogonial stem cell culture.

Y Zheng, A Thomas, C M Schmidt, C T Dann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Primary Cultures of Spermatogonia and Testis Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Perspectives: Methods for Evaluating Primate Spermatogonial Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Spermatogonial Stem Cell Culture in Oncofertility.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Xeno-Free Propagation of Spermatogonial Stem Cells from Infant Boys.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Y ZhengIndiana University, 800 E. Kirkwood Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102, USA.
A ThomasIndiana University, 800 E. Kirkwood Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102, USA.
C M SchmidtIndiana University, 800 E. Kirkwood Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102, USA.
C T DannIndiana University, 800 E. Kirkwood Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405-7102, USA ctdann@indiana.edu.
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Molecular control of spermatogonial stem cell fate for achieving cell therapyR01HD071081 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI DANN, CHRISTINA TENENHAUS · 2012 to 2016
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS TR000006NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCan human spermatogonia be detected in long-term primary testicular cell cultures using validated, germ cell-specific markers of spermatogonia? SUMMARY ANSWER: Germ cell-specific markers of spermatogonia/spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are detected in early (1-2 weeks) but not late (> 6 weeks) primary testicular cell cultures; somatic cell markers are detected in late primary testicular cell cultures. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The development of conditions for human SSC culture is critically dependent on the ability to define cell types unequivocally and to quantify spermatogonia/SSCs. Growth by somatic cells presents a major challenge in the establishment of SSC cultures and therefore markers that define spermatogonia/SSCs, but are not also expressed by testicular somatic cells, are essential for accurate characterization of SSC cultures. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Testicular tissue from eight organ donors with normal spermatogenesis was used for assay validation and establishing primary testicular cell cultures. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsImmunofluorescence analysis of normal human testicular tissue was used to validate antibodies (UTF1, SALL4, DAZL and VIM) and then the antibodies were used to demonstrate that primary testicular cells cultured in vitro for 1-2 weeks were composed of somatic cells and rare germ cells. Primary testicular cell cultures were further characterized by comparing to testicular somatic cell cultures using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (UTF1, FGFR3, ZBTB16, GPR125, DAZL, GATA4 and VIM) and flow cytometry (CD9 and SSEA4). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: UTF1, FGFR3, DAZL and ZBTB16 qRT-PCR and SSEA4 flow cytometry were validated for the sensitive, quantitative and specific detection of germ cells. In contrast, GPR125 mRNA and CD9 were found to be not specific to germ cells because they were also expressed in testicular somatic cell cultures. While the germ cell-specific markers were detected in early primary testicular cell cultures (1-2 weeks), their expression steadily declined over time in vitro. After 6 weeks in culture only somatic cells were detected. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Different groups attempting SSC culture have utilized different sources of human testes and minor differences in the preparation and maintenance of the testicular cell cultures. Differences in outcome may be explained by genetic background of the source tissue or technical differences. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe ability to propagate human SSCs in vitro is a prerequisite for proposed autologous transplantation therapy aimed at restoring fertility to men who have been treated for childhood cancer. By applying the assays validated here it will be possible to quantitatively compare human SSC culture conditions. The eventual development of conditions for long-term propagation of human SSCs in vitro will greatly facilitate learning about the basic biology of these cells and in turn the ability to use human SSCs in therapy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The experiments presented in this manuscript were funded by a Project Development Team within the ICTSI NIH/NCRR Grant Number TR000006. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

SpermatogenesisAdolescentAdultAdult Stem CellsBiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedHumansMaleNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSpermatogoniaTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsYoung AdultBiomarkersDAZL protein, humanNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSALL4 protein, humanTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsUTF1 protein, humancell culturefertilitygerm cellsstage-specific embryonic antigenstestis

Identifiers

PMID25267789
PMCPMC4191455
OpenAlexW2141908532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.