Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25267660›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Comparison of intrapulmonary and systemic pharmacokinetics of colistin methanesulfonate (CMS) and colistin after aerosol delivery and intravenous administration of CMS in critically ill patients.

Matthieu Boisson, Matthieu Jacobs, Nicolas Grégoire, Patrice Gobin, Sandrine Marchand, William Couet, Olivier Mimoz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthieu BoissonCHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France INSERM U1070, Poitiers, France.
Matthieu JacobsINSERM U1070, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Nicolas GrégoireINSERM U1070, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Patrice GobinCHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France INSERM U1070, Poitiers, France.
Sandrine MarchandCHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France INSERM U1070, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
William CouetCHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France INSERM U1070, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France william.couet@univ-poitiers.fr.
Olivier MimozCHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France INSERM U1070, Poitiers, France Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colistin is an old antibiotic that has recently gained a considerable renewal of interest for the treatment of pulmonary infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Nebulization seems to be a promising form of administration, but colistin is administered as an inactive prodrug, colistin methanesulfonate (CMS); however, differences between the intrapulmonary concentrations of the active moiety as a function of the route of administration in critically ill patients have not been precisely documented. In this study, CMS and colistin concentrations were measured on two separate occasions within the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of critically ill patients (n = 12) who had received 2 million international units (MIU) of CMS by aerosol delivery and then intravenous administration. The pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted using a population approach and completed by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling and simulations. The ELF colistin concentrations varied considerably (9.53 to 1,137 mg/liter), but they were much higher than those in plasma (0.15 to 0.73 mg/liter) after aerosol delivery but not after intravenous administration of CMS. Following CMS aerosol delivery, typically, 9% of the CMS dose reached the ELF, and only 1.4% was presystemically converted into colistin. PK-PD analysis concluded that there was much higher antimicrobial efficacy after CMS aerosol delivery than after intravenous administration. These new data seem to support the use of aerosol delivery of CMS for the treatment of pulmonary infections in critical care patients.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdministration, InhalationAdministration, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiotransformationColistinCritical IllnessDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Dosage CalculationsExtracellular FluidFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistincolistinmethanesulfonic acid

Identifiers

PMID25267660
PMCPMC4249558
OpenAlexW2026238168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.