Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25267659›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Erosion of functional independence early in the evolution of a microbial mutualism.

Kristina L Hillesland, Sujung Lim, Jason J Flowers, Serdar Turkarslan, Nicolas Pinel, Grant M Zane, Nicholas Elliott, Yujia Qin, Liyou Wu, Nitin S Baliga and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary repeatability of emergent properties of ecological communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Exchange of Vitamin BJournal of bacteriology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Engineering Cooperation in an Anaerobic Coculture.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Extracellular Metabolism Sets the Table for Microbial Cross-Feeding.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Novel Mode of Molybdate Inhibition ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  15. From Microbial Communities to Distributed Computing Systems.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kristina L HilleslandBiological Sciences, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, WA 98011; hilleskl@uw.edu.
Sujung LimBiological Sciences, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, WA 98011;
Jason J FlowersCivil and Environmental Engineering, and.
Serdar TurkarslanInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109-5234;
Nicolas PinelCivil and Environmental Engineering, and Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109-5234;
Grant M ZaneDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211;
Nicholas ElliottCivil and Environmental Engineering, and.
Yujia QinInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019;
Liyou WuInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019;
Nitin S BaligaInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109-5234; Departments of Biology and Microbiology, Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington Seattle, Seattle, WA 98195; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720; and.
Jizhong ZhouInstitute for Environmental Genomics and Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019; Earth Science Division, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Judy D WallDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211;
David A StahlCivil and Environmental Engineering, and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many species have evolved to function as specialized mutualists, often to the detriment of their ability to survive independently. However, there are few, if any, well-controlled observations of the evolutionary processes underlying the genesis of new mutualisms. Here, we show that within the first 1,000 generations of initiating independent syntrophic interactions between a sulfate reducer (Desulfovibrio vulgaris) and a hydrogenotrophic methanogen (Methanococcus maripaludis), D. vulgaris frequently lost the capacity to grow by sulfate respiration, thus losing the primary physiological attribute of the genus. The loss of sulfate respiration was a consequence of mutations in one or more of three key genes in the pathway for sulfate respiration, required for sulfate activation (sat) and sulfate reduction to sulfite (apsA or apsB). Because loss-of-function mutations arose rapidly and independently in replicated experiments, and because these mutations were correlated with enhanced growth rate and productivity, gene loss could be attributed to natural selection, even though these mutations should significantly restrict the independence of the evolved D. vulgaris. Together, these data present an empirical demonstration that specialization for a mutualistic interaction can evolve by natural selection shortly after its origin. They also demonstrate that a sulfate-reducing bacterium can readily evolve to become a specialized syntroph, a situation that may have often occurred in nature.

Indexed as

Directed Molecular EvolutionCoculture TechniquesDesulfovibrio vulgarisMethanococcusMutationOxidation-ReductionPhenotypeSulfatesSymbiosisSulfatescoevolutionexperimental evolutionsulfate-reducing prokaryotesyntrophytrade-offs

Identifiers

PMID25267659
PMCPMC4205623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.