Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25267336›Full record

ReviewSystematic reviews2014

An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta-analysis.

Deborah M Caldwell

Abstract readEditorialReview
In one paragraph

Review in Systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Decision Curve Analysis for Personalized Treatment Choice between Multiple Options.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Deborah M CaldwellSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whately Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK. d.m.caldwell@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902118Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Comparative Effectiveness ResearchMeta-Analysis as TopicReview Literature as TopicData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID25267336
PMCPMC4183945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.