Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25267114›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2015

Lay Social Resources for Support of Adherence to Antiretroviral Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention Among Serodiscordant Couples in sub-Saharan Africa: A Qualitative Study.

Norma C Ware, Emily E Pisarski, Jessica E Haberer, Monique A Wyatt, Elioda Tumwesigye, Jared M Baeten, Connie L Celum, David R Bangsberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Psychosocial support for HIV serodiscordant couples.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Norma C WareDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA, USA, norma_ware@hms.harvard.edu.
Emily E Pisarski
Jessica E Haberer
Monique A Wyatt
Elioda Tumwesigye
Jared M Baeten
Connie L Celum
David R Bangsberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effectiveness of antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention will require high adherence. Using qualitative data, this paper identifies potential lay social resources for support of PrEP adherence by HIV serodiscordant couples in Uganda, laying the groundwork for incorporation of these resources into adherence support initiatives as part of implementation. The qualitative analysis characterizes support for PrEP adherence provided by HIV-infected spouses, children, extended family members, and the larger community. Results suggest social resources for support of PrEP adherence in Africa are plentiful outside formal health care settings and health systems and that couples will readily use them. The same shortage of health professionals that impeded scale-up of antiretroviral treatment for HIV/AIDS in Africa promises to challenge delivery of PrEP. Building on the treatment scale-up experience, implementers can address this challenge by examining the value of lay social resources for adherence support in developing strategies for delivery of PrEP.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsHIV SeronegativityMedication AdherenceAdultAnti-HIV AgentsFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMultivariate AnalysisPre-Exposure ProphylaxisQualitative ResearchRegression AnalysisSexual PartnersAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID25267114
PMCPMC4415942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.