ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014
Health checks and screening: what works in general practice?
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What maximizes the effectiveness and implementation of technology-based interventions to support healthcare professional practice? A systematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Pooled it
- 'I should have taken that further' - missed opportunities during cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with psoriasis in UK primary care settings: a mixed-methods study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2016Article
- Article
- Communicating Cardiovascular Disease Risk to People with Psoriasis: What Techniques do Practitioners Use?International journal of behavioral medicine · 2016Article
- The status quo is not an evidence-based option.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.