Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25266546›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2015

Measuring preparedness for mammography in women with intellectual disabilities: a validation study of the Mammography Preparedness Measure.

Claire Tienwey Wang, Nechama Greenwood, Laura F White, Joanne Wilkinson

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Testing the feasibility of a DVD-based intervention to promote preparedness for mammography in women with intellectual disabilities.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire Tienwey WangDepartment of Family Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Nechama Greenwood
Laura F White
Joanne Wilkinson
Boston University · US

Funding

Mammography in Women with Intellectual DisabilitiesK07CA134547 · NCI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI WILKINSON, JOANNE ELIZABETH · 2009 to 2013
$812k
NCI NIH HHS 5K07 CA 1345547-04NCI NIH HHS K07 CA134547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with intellectual disabilities have similar breast cancer rates as the general population, but lower rates of regular mammography and higher breast cancer mortality rates. Although prior qualitative work demonstrates that women with intellectual disabilities face unique, disability-specific barriers to mammography, the present authors lack standardized, validated instruments for measuring knowledge of breast cancer screening in this population. In addition, much research related to adults with intellectual disabilities focuses on family or carer perspectives, rather than involving women with intellectual disabilities, themselves.

methodsThe present authors first pilot tested a general population instrument measuring breast cancer knowledge, and found that it did not perform adequately in women with intellectual disabilities. In response, the present authors developed the Mammography Preparedness Measure (MPM), a direct short interview tool to measure knowledge and preparedness in women with intellectual disabilities, themselves, rather than relying on caregiver or other reports, and using inclusive methodology. The present authors validated the MPM by assessing test-retest reliability.

resultsAverage test-retest per cent agreement of 84%, ranging from 74 to 91% agreement per item, with an overall kappa of 0.59.

conclusionThe MPM appears to be a valid instrument appropriate for measuring mammography preparedness in women with intellectual disabilities. The success of this innovative tool suggests that direct, rather than informant-directed tools can be developed to measure health knowledge and cancer screening readiness in adults with intellectual disabilities, an important measure in studying and reducing disparities.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMammographyMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesbehavioural measurement toolshealth disparitiesinstrument designintellectual disabilitymammographyvalidation

Identifiers

PMID25266546
PMCPMC4379134
OpenAlexW2123517111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.