Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25266133›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2014

Mechanisms of the effects of prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome.

C Guerin, L Baboi, J C Richard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C GuerinService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de la croix-rousse, CHU de Lyon, Bâtiment R, 2ème étage, 103 Grande rue de la croix-rousse, 69004, Lyon, France, claude.guerin@chu-lyon.fr.
L Baboi
J C Richard
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProne positioning has been used for many years in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The initial reason for prone positioning in ARDS patients was improvement in oxygenation. It was later shown that mechanical ventilation in the prone position can be less injurious to the lung and hence the primary reason to use prone positioning is prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). MATERIAL AND

methodsA large body of physiologic benefits of prone positioning in ARDS patients accumulated but these failed to translate into clinical benefits. More recently, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trial in a specific subgroup of ARDS patients demonstrated that prone positioning can improve survival. This review covers the effects of prone positioning on oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, and VILI.

conclusionsWe conclude with the effects of prone positioning on patient outcome, in particular on survival.

Indexed as

Critical CareHumansProne PositionRespiratory Distress Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID25266133
OpenAlexW2137169928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.