Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25266029›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2014

Surgical treatments for esophageal cancers.

William H Allum, Luigi Bonavina, Stephen D Cassivi, Miguel A Cuesta, Zhao Ming Dong, Valter Nilton Felix, Edgar Figueredo, Piers A C Gatenby, Leonie Haverkamp, Maksat A Ibraev and 18 more

Open access · greenAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Circ_0024108 promotes the progression of esophageal cancer cells.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Routine use of nasogastric drainage tubes.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 17 institutions in 8 countries.

William H AllumDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Luigi Bonavina
Stephen D Cassivi
Miguel A Cuesta
Zhao Ming Dong
Valter Nilton Felix
Edgar Figueredo
Piers A C Gatenby
Leonie Haverkamp
Maksat A Ibraev
Mark J Krasna
René Lambert
Rupert Langer
Michael P N Lewis
Katie S Nason
Kevin Parry
Shaun R Preston
Jelle P Ruurda
Lara W Schaheen
Roger P Tatum
Igor N Turkin
Sylvia van der Horst
Donald L van der Peet
Peter C van der Sluis
Richard van Hillegersberg
Justin C R Wormald
Peter C Wu
Barbara M Zonderhuis
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBRussian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin · RUUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Washington · USBloodworks Northwest · USCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRJersey Shore University Medical Center · USMayo Clinic · USRoyal Marsden Hospital · GBRoyal Surrey County Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Puget Sound · US

Funding

Barriers to Early Detection of Esophageal AdenocarcinomaK07CA151613 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NASON, KATIE S · 2011 to 2015
$818k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA151613World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The following, from the 12th OESO World Conference: Cancers of the Esophagus, includes commentaries on the role of the nurse in preparation of esophageal resection (ER); the management of patients who develop high-grade dysplasia after having undergone Nissen fundoplication; the trajectory of care for the patient with esophageal cancer; the influence of the site of tumor in the choice of treatment; the best location for esophagogastrostomy; management of chylous leak after esophagectomy; the optimal approach to manage thoracic esophageal leak after esophagectomy; the choice for operational approach in surgery of cardioesophageal crossing; the advantages of robot esophagectomy; the place of open esophagectomy; the advantages of esophagectomy compared to definitive chemoradiotherapy; the pathologist report in the resected specimen; the best way to manage patients with unsuspected positive microscopic margin after ER; enhanced recovery after surgery for ER: expedited care protocols; and long-term quality of life in patients following esophagectomy.

Indexed as

AnimalsEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFundoplicationHumansParisTreatment Outcomechemoradiotherapyesophageal resectionesophagectomyesophagogastrostomyNissen fundoplicationOESO

Identifiers

PMID25266029
PMCPMC4384171
OpenAlexW1584683704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.