Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25265912›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2014

The development of immunoconjugates for targeted cancer therapy.

Brandon G Smaglo, Dalal Aldeghaither, Louis M Weiner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Strategies to target PD-1/PD-L1 in the tumor microenvironment.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brandon G SmagloLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3970 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Dalal AldeghaitherLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3970 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Louis M WeinerLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3970 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA.
Georgetown University · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
TARGETED IMMUNOTHERAPY USING BISPECIFIC ANTIBODIESR01CA050633 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI WEINER, LOUIS M. · 1989 to 2018
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA050633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoconjugates are specific, highly effective, minimally toxic anticancer therapies that are beginning to show promise in the clinic. Immunoconjugates consist of three separate components: an antibody that binds to a cancer cell antigen with high specificity, an effector molecule that has a high capacity to kill the cancer cell, and a linker that will ensure the effector does not separate from the antibody during transit and will reliably release the effector to the cancer cell or tumour stroma. The high affinity antibody-antigen interaction allows specific and selective delivery of a range of effectors, including pharmacologic agents, radioisotopes, and toxins, to cancer cells. Some anticancer molecules are not well tolerated when administered systemically owing to unacceptable toxicity to the host. However, this limitation can be overcome through the linking of such cytotoxins to specific antibodies, which mask the toxic effects of the drug until it reaches its target. Conversely, many unconjugated antibodies are highly specific for a cancer target, but have low therapeutic potential and can be repurposed as delivery vehicles for highly potent effectors. In this Review, we summarize the successes and shortcomings of immunoconjugates, and discuss the future potential for the development of these therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDrug Delivery SystemsHumansImmunization, PassiveImmunoconjugatesImmunotherapyMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsProtein EngineeringImmunoconjugates

Identifiers

PMID25265912
PMCPMC4700536
OpenAlexW1966634965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.