Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25265510›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Interactive local super-resolution reconstruction of whole-body MRI mouse data: a pilot study with applications to bone and kidney metastases.

Oleh Dzyubachyk, Artem Khmelinskii, Esben Plenge, Peter Kok, Thomas J A Snoeks, Dirk H J Poot, Clemens W G M Löwik, Charl P Botha, Wiro J Niessen, Louise van der Weerd and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Oleh DzyubachykDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Artem KhmelinskiiDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Percuros B.V., Enschede, the Netherlands.
Esben PlengeDepartments of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter KokDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Intelligent Systems, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Thomas J A SnoeksDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dirk H J PootDepartments of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Quantitative Imaging Group, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Clemens W G M LöwikDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Charl P BothaDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Intelligent Systems, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Wiro J NiessenDepartments of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Quantitative Imaging Group, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Louise van der WeerdDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Erik MeijeringDepartments of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Boudewijn P F LelieveldtDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Intelligent Systems, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In small animal imaging studies, when the locations of the micro-structures of interest are unknown a priori, there is a simultaneous need for full-body coverage and high resolution. In MRI, additional requirements to image contrast and acquisition time will often make it impossible to acquire such images directly. Recently, a resolution enhancing post-processing technique called super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) has been demonstrated to improve visualization and localization of micro-structures in small animal MRI by combining multiple low-resolution acquisitions. However, when the field-of-view is large relative to the desired voxel size, solving the SRR problem becomes very expensive, in terms of both memory requirements and computation time. In this paper we introduce a novel local approach to SRR that aims to overcome the computational problems and allow researchers to efficiently explore both global and local characteristics in whole-body small animal MRI. The method integrates state-of-the-art image processing techniques from the areas of articulated atlas-based segmentation, planar reformation, and SRR. A proof-of-concept is provided with two case studies involving CT, BLI, and MRI data of bone and kidney tumors in a mouse model. We show that local SRR-MRI is a computationally efficient complementary imaging modality for the precise characterization of tumor metastases, and that the method provides a feasible high-resolution alternative to conventional MRI.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsBone NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidney NeoplasmsLuminescent MeasurementsMice, Inbred BALB CPhantoms, ImagingPilot ProjectsTime FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body Imaging

Identifiers

PMID25265510
PMCPMC4181866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.