Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25265012›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Dynamic autophosphorylation of mps1 kinase is required for faithful mitotic progression.

Xinghui Wang, Huijuan Yu, Leilei Xu, Tongge Zhu, Fan Zheng, Chuanhai Fu, Zhiyong Wang, Zhen Dou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Autophosphorylation is sufficient to release Mps1 kinase from native kinetochores.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Dynamic localization of Mps1 kinase to kinetochores is essential for accurate spindle microtubule attachment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinghui WangHefei National Laboratory of Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; Anhui key Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Huijuan YuHefei National Laboratory of Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; Anhui key Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Leilei XuHefei National Laboratory of Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; Anhui key Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Tongge ZhuHefei National Laboratory of Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; Anhui key Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Fan ZhengDepartment of Biochemistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; HKU-Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Chuanhai FuDepartment of Biochemistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; HKU-Shenzhen Institute of Research and Innovation, The University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.
Zhiyong WangHefei National Laboratory of Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; Anhui key Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Zhen DouHefei National Laboratory of Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China; Anhui key Laboratory of Cellular Dynamics and Chemical Biology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a surveillance mechanism monitoring cell cycle progression, thus ensuring accurate chromosome segregation. The conserved mitotic kinase Mps1 is a key component of the SAC. The human Mps1 exhibits comprehensive phosphorylation during mitosis. However, the related biological relevance is largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that 8 autophosphorylation sites within the N-terminus of Mps1, outside of the catalytic domain, are involved in regulating Mps1 kinetochore localization. The phospho-mimicking mutant of the 8 autophosphorylation sites impairs Mps1 localization to kinetochore and also affects the kinetochore recruitment of BubR1 and Mad2, two key SAC effectors, subsequently leading to chromosome segregation errors. Interestingly, the non-phosphorylatable mutant of the 8 autophosphorylation sites enhances Mps1 kinetochore localization and delays anaphase onset. We further show that the Mps1 phospho-mimicking and non-phosphorylatable mutants do not affect metaphase chromosome congression. Thus, our results highlight the importance of dynamic autophosphorylation of Mps1 in regulating accurate chromosome segregation and ensuring proper mitotic progression.

Indexed as

MitosisCell Cycle ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesSerineThreonineCell Cycle ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesSerineThreonineTTK protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25265012
PMCPMC4179234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.