Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25264894›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Predicting cannabis abuse screening test (CAST) scores: a recursive partitioning analysis using survey data from Czech Republic, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden.

Matthijs Blankers, Tom Frijns, Vendula Belackova, Carla Rossi, Bengt Svensson, Franz Trautmann, Margriet van Laar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthijs BlankersDepartment of Drug Monitoring, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research, Arkin, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tom FrijnsDepartment of Drug Monitoring, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Vendula BelackovaDepartment of Addictology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Carla RossiCentre for Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Bengt SvenssonDepartment of Social Work, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Franz TrautmannDepartment of Drug Monitoring, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Margriet van LaarDepartment of Drug Monitoring, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Trimbos Institute · NLArkin · NLCharles University · CZMalmö University · SEUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCannabis is Europe's most commonly used illicit drug. Some users do not develop dependence or other problems, whereas others do. Many factors are associated with the occurrence of cannabis-related disorders. This makes it difficult to identify key risk factors and markers to profile at-risk cannabis users using traditional hypothesis-driven approaches. Therefore, the use of a data-mining technique called binary recursive partitioning is demonstrated in this study by creating a classification tree to profile at-risk users.

methods59 variables on cannabis use and drug market experiences were extracted from an internet-based survey dataset collected in four European countries (Czech Republic, Italy, Netherlands and Sweden), n = 2617. These 59 potential predictors of problematic cannabis use were used to partition individual respondents into subgroups with low and high risk of having a cannabis use disorder, based on their responses on the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test. Both a generic model for the four countries combined and four country-specific models were constructed.

resultsOf the 59 variables included in the first analysis step, only three variables were required to construct a generic partitioning model to classify high risk cannabis users with 65-73% accuracy. Based on the generic model for the four countries combined, the highest risk for cannabis use disorder is seen in participants reporting a cannabis use on more than 200 days in the last 12 months. In comparison to the generic model, the country-specific models led to modest, non-significant improvements in classification accuracy, with an exception for Italy (p = 0.01).

conclusionUsing recursive partitioning, it is feasible to construct classification trees based on only a few variables with acceptable performance to classify cannabis users into groups with low or high risk of meeting criteria for cannabis use disorder. The number of cannabis use days in the last 12 months is the most relevant variable. The identified variables may be considered for use in future screeners for cannabis use disorders.

Indexed as

AdultCannabinoidsCocaine-Related DisordersCzech RepublicData CollectionFemaleHumansItalyMaleMarijuana AbuseMarijuana SmokingMultivariate AnalysisNetherlandsRiskSubstance Abuse DetectionSwedenCannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID25264894
PMCPMC4180744
OpenAlexW2112218801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.