Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25264458›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2014

Quantitative estimation of pesticide-likeness for agrochemical discovery.

Sorin Avram, Simona Funar-Timofei, Ana Borota, Sridhar Rao Chennamaneni, Anil Kumar Manchala, Sorel Muresan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Insecticidal and Bactericidal Activities ofTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Structure-guided computational insecticide discovery targetingJournal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2024
    Article
  12. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sorin AvramDepartment of Computational Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry of Romanian Academy Timisoara, 24 Mihai Viteazul Avenue, 300223 Timisoara, Romania.
Simona Funar-TimofeiDepartment of Computational Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry of Romanian Academy Timisoara, 24 Mihai Viteazul Avenue, 300223 Timisoara, Romania.
Ana BorotaDepartment of Computational Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry of Romanian Academy Timisoara, 24 Mihai Viteazul Avenue, 300223 Timisoara, Romania.
Sridhar Rao ChennamaneniGVK Biosciences Pvt. Ltd., S1, Phase-1, Technocrats Industrial Estate, Balanagar Hyderabad, 500 037 India.
Anil Kumar ManchalaGVK Biosciences Pvt. Ltd., S1, Phase-1, Technocrats Industrial Estate, Balanagar Hyderabad, 500 037 India.
Sorel MuresanFood Control Department, Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Calea Aradului 119, 300645 Timisoara, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe design of chemical libraries, an early step in agrochemical discovery programs, is frequently addressed by means of qualitative physicochemical and/or topological rule-based methods. The aim of this study is to develop quantitative estimates of herbicide- (QEH), insecticide- (QEI), fungicide- (QEF), and, finally, pesticide-likeness (QEP). In the assessment of these definitions, we relied on the concept of desirability functions.

resultsWe found a simple function, shared by the three classes of pesticides, parameterized particularly, for six, easy to compute, independent and interpretable, molecular properties: molecular weight, logP, number of hydrogen bond acceptors, number of hydrogen bond donors, number of rotatable bounds and number of aromatic rings. Subsequently, we describe the scoring of each pesticide class by the corresponding quantitative estimate. In a comparative study, we assessed the performance of the scoring functions using extensive datasets of patented pesticides.

conclusionsThe hereby-established quantitative assessment has the ability to rank compounds whether they fail well-established pesticide-likeness rules or not, and offer an efficient way to prioritize (class-specific) pesticides. These findings are valuable for the efficient estimation of pesticide-likeness of vast chemical libraries in the field of agrochemical discovery. Graphical AbstractQuantitative models for pesticide-likeness were derived using the concept of desirability functions parameterized for six, easy to compute, independent and interpretable, molecular properties: molecular weight, logP, number of hydrogen bond acceptors, number of hydrogen bond donors, number of rotatable bounds and number of aromatic rings.

Indexed as

AgrochemicalsFungicideHerbicideInsecticidePesticideSAR databases

Identifiers

PMID25264458
PMCPMC4173135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.