ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2014
Practical guidance on informed consent for pediatric participants in a biorepository.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioethics and medical oversight in multi-site observational neuroimaging studies with children and adolescents: 10 years of ABCD experience.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Ethical guidelines for human research on children and adolescents: A narrative review study.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024Review
- Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2023Article
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data.Journal of medical ethics · 2023Article
- Open Science Within Pediatric Medical and Mental Health Systems: Practical Considerations for Behavioral Health Researchers.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Model consent clauses for rare disease research.BMC medical ethics · 2019Article
- Anticipatory Waivers of Consent for Pediatric Biobanking.Ethics & human research · 2019Article
- Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2018Article
- Article
- Reconsidering the Need for Reconsent at 18.Pediatrics · 2018Review
- Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2018Article
- Ethical Considerations Related to Return of Results from Genomic Medicine Projects: The eMERGE Network (Phase III) Experience.Journal of personalized medicine · 2018Article
- Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.American journal of human genetics · 2016Article
- When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of Majority.The Journal of pediatrics · 2016Article
- Considerations for Returning Research Results to Culturally Diverse Participants and Families of Decedents.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.