Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25263653›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2014

Effect of childhood obesity prevention programmes on blood lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

L Cai, Y Wu, L J Cheskin, R F Wilson, Y Wang

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L CaiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Johns Hopkins Global Center on Childhood Obesity, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Y Wu
L J Cheskin
R F Wilson
Y Wang
Johns Hopkins University · USSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

MULTILEVEL SYSTEMS-ORIENTED CHILDHOOD OBESITY STUDY IN CHINAU54HD070725 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GITTELSOHN, JOEL · 2011 to 2016
$15.9M
Causes and Interventions for Childhood Obesity:Innovative Systems AnalysisR01HD064685 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI WANG, YOUFA · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD064685NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD070725PHS HHS 290-2007-10061-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to assess the effects of childhood obesity prevention programmes on blood lipids in high-income countries. We searched MEDLINE®, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL®, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library up to 22 April 2013 for relevant randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies and natural experiments published in English. Studies were included if they implemented diet and/or physical activity intervention(s) with ≥1 year follow-up (or ≥6 months for school-based intervention studies) in 2-18-year-olds, and were excluded if they targeted only overweight/obese children, or those with a pre-existing medical condition. Seventeen studies were finally included. For total cholesterol, the pooled intervention effect was -0.97 mg dL(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI): -3.26, 1.32; P = 0.408]; for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), -6.06 mg dL(-1) (95% CI: -11.09, -1.02; P = 0.018); for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), 1.87 mg dL(-1) (95% CI: 0.39, 3.34; P = 0.013); and for triglycerides, -1.95 mg dL(-1) (95% CI: -4.94, 1.04; P = 0.202). Most interventions (70%) showed similar significant or no effects on adiposity- and lipids outcomes: 15% interventions improved both adiposity- and lipids outcomes; 55% had no significant effects on either. Childhood obesity prevention programmes had a significant desirable effect on LDL-C and HDL-C. Two-thirds of interventions showed similar significant or no effects in adiposity- and lipids outcomes. Assessing lipids outcomes provide additional useful information on obesity prevention programme benefits.

Indexed as

AdiposityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDietExerciseHumansLipidsMEDLINEPediatric ObesityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchool Health ServicesSocioeconomic FactorsTreatment OutcomeLipidsChildlipidsobesityprevention

Identifiers

PMID25263653
PMCPMC4341953
OpenAlexW2109494223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.