Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25263348›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Comparative genome analysis of entomopathogenic fungi reveals a complex set of secreted proteins.

Charley Christian Staats, Angela Junges, Rafael Lucas Muniz Guedes, Claudia Elizabeth Thompson, Guilherme Loss de Morais, Juliano Tomazzoni Boldo, Luiz Gonzaga Paula de Almeida, Fábio Carrer Andreis, Alexandra Lehmkuhl Gerber, Nicolau Sbaraini and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi: The next frontier in mycological biocontrol.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TwoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Mycobiology · 2017
    Article
  20. The Insect Pathogens.Microbiology spectrum · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charley Christian Staats
Angela Junges
Rafael Lucas Muniz Guedes
Claudia Elizabeth Thompson
Guilherme Loss de Morais
Juliano Tomazzoni Boldo
Luiz Gonzaga Paula de Almeida
Fábio Carrer Andreis
Alexandra Lehmkuhl Gerber
Nicolau Sbaraini
Rana Louise de Andrade da Paixão
Leonardo Broetto
Melissa Landell
Lucélia Santi
Walter Orlando Beys-da-Silva
Carolina Pereira Silveira
Thaiane Rispoli Serrano
Eder Silva de Oliveira
Lívia Kmetzsch
Marilene Henning Vainstein
Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos
Augusto SchrankCentro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), P, O, Box 15005, Porto Alegre, RS CEP 91501-970, Brazil. aschrank@cbiot.ufrgs.br.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRLaboratório Nacional de Computação Científica · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetarhizium anisopliae is an entomopathogenic fungus used in the biological control of some agricultural insect pests, and efforts are underway to use this fungus in the control of insect-borne human diseases. A large repertoire of proteins must be secreted by M. anisopliae to cope with the various available nutrients as this fungus switches through different lifestyles, i.e., from a saprophytic, to an infectious, to a plant endophytic stage. To further evaluate the predicted secretome of M. anisopliae, we employed genomic and transcriptomic analyses, coupled with phylogenomic analysis, focusing on the identification and characterization of secreted proteins.

resultsWe determined the M. anisopliae E6 genome sequence and compared this sequence to other entomopathogenic fungi genomes. A robust pipeline was generated to evaluate the predicted secretomes of M. anisopliae and 15 other filamentous fungi, leading to the identification of a core of secreted proteins. Transcriptomic analysis using the tick Rhipicephalus microplus cuticle as an infection model during two periods of infection (48 and 144 h) allowed the identification of several differentially expressed genes. This analysis concluded that a large proportion of the predicted secretome coding genes contained altered transcript levels in the conditions analyzed in this study. In addition, some specific secreted proteins from Metarhizium have an evolutionary history similar to orthologs found in Beauveria/Cordyceps. This similarity suggests that a set of secreted proteins has evolved to participate in entomopathogenicity.

conclusionsThe data presented represents an important step to the characterization of the role of secreted proteins in the virulence and pathogenicity of M. anisopliae.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalAnimalsComparative Genomic HybridizationFungal ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingHost-Pathogen InteractionsMetarhiziumPhylogenyRhipicephalusSequence Analysis, RNAFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25263348
PMCPMC4246632
OpenAlexW2096492983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.