Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25263319›Full record

ArticleLeukemia & lymphoma2015

Flow cytometric sensitivity and characteristics of plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma or its precursor disease: influence of biopsy site and anticoagulation method.

Elisabet E Manasanch, Dalia A Salem, Constance M Yuan, Nishant Tageja, Manisha Bhutani, Mary Kwok, Dickran Kazandjian, George Carter, Seth M Steinberg, Diamond Zuchlinski and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: why, when, where.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What to do with minimal residual disease testing in myeloma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabet E ManasanchMultiple Myeloma Section, Metabolism Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, MD , USA.
Dalia A Salem
Constance M Yuan
Nishant Tageja
Manisha Bhutani
Mary Kwok
Dickran Kazandjian
George Carter
Seth M Steinberg
Diamond Zuchlinski
Marcia Mulquin
Katherine Calvo
Irina Maric
Mark Roschewski
Neha Korde
Raul Braylan
Ola Landgren
Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Benign and Malignant TumorsZICSC009372 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI WANG, HAO-WEI · 2009 to 2025
$29.6M
Collaboration with Investigators from the Multiple Myeloma Section, Medical Oncology Branch, NCI and of the Molecular Medicine Branch, Molecular Genomics & Therapeutics Section, NIDDKZIACL060089 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI BRAYLAN, RAUL · 2014 to 2015
$0k
The Role of microRNA in Hematologic MalignanciesZIACL090025 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI CALVO, KATHERINE · 2010 to 2025
$0k
Bone Marrow Histopathological Changes in Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic DiseasesZIACL090027 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI MARIC, IRINA · 2010 to 2025
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry has increasing relevance for prognosis in myeloma and precursor disease (monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance/smoldering myeloma), yet it has been reported that plasma cell enumeration by flow varies depending on the quality of marrow aspirate and field biopsied in patchy disease. We demonstrated increased sensitivity of flow over immunohistochemistry in abnormal-plasma cell detection in monoclonal gammopathy (n = 59)/smoldering myeloma (n = 87). We prospectively evaluated treatment-na ve smoldering myeloma (n = 9)/myeloma (n = 11) patients for the percentage of abnormal plasma cells/total plasma cell compartment, plasma cell viability/infiltration and flow immunophenotype depending on anticoagulant use, biopsy site and pull sequence in uni-and-bilateral bone marrow biopsies and aspirates. We found no statistical difference regarding the percentage of abnormal plasma cells, their immunophenotype or number/distribution in marrow samples even when obtained by different sequence in aspirates, or anticoagulants (p > 0.05). Our results show that plasma cell enumeration and immunophenotyping by flow cytometry is consistent under different conditions in these populations.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryAntigens, SurfaceBiopsyBone MarrowFemaleHumansImmunophenotypingMaleMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMultiple MyelomaPlasma CellsAntigens, Surfaceenumerationflowmyelomaplasma cellriskSmoldering

Identifiers

PMID25263319
PMCPMC5576181
OpenAlexW2012552711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.