Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25263254›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2014

Two doses of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: observation of therapeutic effect from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Haifeng Zhang, Yajun Lian, Yunqing Ma, Yuan Chen, Caihong He, Nanchang Xie, Chuanjie Wu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06216886 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intradermal Injections of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs Saline for Trigeminal Neuralgia.), which is not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06216886 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial of Intradermal Injections of OnabotulinumtoxinA vs Saline for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2024 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsTrigeminal NeuralgiaArmsOnabotulinumtoxinA 100 UNT [Botox], Sodium Chloride 0.9% for Injection, Preservative Free
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haifeng Zhang
Yajun LianDepartment of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, 1 Jianshe East R, Zhengzhou City, HeNan Province 450052, People's Republic of China. lianyajun840317@163.com.
Yunqing Ma
Yuan Chen
Caihong He
Nanchang Xie
Chuanjie Wu
Zhengzhou University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the majority of cases, trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a unilateral condition with ultra-short stabbing pain located along one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Although prophylactic pharmacological treatment is first choise, considering of insufficient effect or unacceptable side effects, neurosurgical treatment or lesion treatment should be considered. In addition to all these procedures mentioned above, one approach has been based on local intradermal and/or submucosal injections of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A).

methodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled since November 2012, and adopted local multi-point injection in 84 cases of classical TN with different doses of BTX-A. Eighty four patients were randomized into following groups: placebo (n = 28); BTX-A 25U (n = 27); BTX-A 75U (n = 29). Follow-up visits were conducted every week after the injection, and the overall duration of the study for each patient were 8 weeks to observe the pain severity, efficacy and adverse reactions at endpoint.

resultsThe visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of 25U and 75U groups reduced significantly compared to placebo as early as week 1, and sustained until week 8 throughout the study. There was no significant difference in VAS between 25U and 75U groups throughout the study. The response rates of 25U group (70.4%) and 75U group (86.2%) were significantly higher than placebo group (32.1%) at week 8, and there was no significant difference between 25U and 75U groups. Evaluation of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) demonstrated that 66.7% (25U group) and 75.9% (75U group) of the patients reported that their pain symptoms were 'much improved' or 'very much improved' versus 32.1% of the placebo group, and there was also no significant difference between 25U and 75U groups. All adverse reactions were graded as mild or moderate.

conclusionsBTX-A injection in TN is safe and efficient. It is a useful treatment for refractory TN. Lower dose (25U) and high dose (75U) were similar in efficacy in short-term.

Indexed as

AgedBotulinum Toxins, Type ADouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular AgentsPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeTrigeminal NeuralgiaBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

PMID25263254
PMCPMC4194456
OpenAlexW2011852775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.