Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25263213›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2015

3T MR-guided in-bore transperineal prostate biopsy: A comparison of robotic and manual needle-guidance templates.

Gaurie Tilak, Kemal Tuncali, Sang-Eun Song, Junichi Tokuda, Olutayo Olubiyi, Fiona Fennessy, Andriy Fedorov, Tobias Penzkofer, Clare Tempany, Nobuhiko Hata

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Motorized template for MRI-guided focal cryoablation of prostate cancer.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. MR conditional prostate intervention systems and actuations review.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. State of the Art and Future Opportunities in MRI-Guided Robot-Assisted Surgery and Interventions.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2022
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gaurie TilakDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kemal TuncaliDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sang-Eun SongDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Junichi TokudaDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Olutayo OlubiyiDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Fiona FennessyDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Andriy FedorovDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Tobias PenzkoferDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clare TempanyDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nobuhiko HataDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Washington University ConsoritumU54EB005149 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON · 2004 to 2013
$39.3M
Image Guided Therapy Center - Ultrasound-based sensor system for the monitoring of COVID-19 patientsP41EB015898 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2012 to 2021
$18.9M
IMAGE GUIDED THERAPY CENTERP41RR019703 · NCRR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI JOLESZ, FERENC A · 2010 to 2011
$8.6M
Enabling Technologies for MRI-Guided Prostate InterventionsR01CA111288 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TEMPANY, CLARE M · 2006 to 2015
$7.8M
Quantitiative MRI of prostate cancer as a biomarker and guide for treatmentU01CA151261 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FENNESSY, FIONA · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
A New Method for Improved Targeting in Image-guided Abdominal InterventionsR01CA138586 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HATA, NOBUHIKO · 2010 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111288NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138586NCI NIH HHS U01 CA151261NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR019703NCRR NIH HHS P41RR019703NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS P41EB015898NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB005149NIBIB NIH HHS U54EB005149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo demonstrate the utility of a robotic needle-guidance template device as compared to a manual template for in-bore 3T transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis two-arm mixed retrospective-prospective study included 99 cases of targeted transperineal prostate biopsies. The biopsy needles were aimed at suspicious foci noted on multiparametric 3T MRI using manual template (historical control) as compared with a robotic template. The following data were obtained: the accuracy of average and closest needle placement to the focus, histologic yield, percentage of cancer volume in positive core samples, complication rate, and time to complete the procedure.

resultsIn all, 56 cases were performed using the manual template and 43 cases were performed using the robotic template. The mean accuracy of the best needle placement attempt was higher in the robotic group (2.39 mm) than the manual group (3.71 mm, P < 0.027). The mean core procedure time was shorter in the robotic (90.82 min) than the manual group (100.63 min, P < 0.030). Percentage of cancer volume in positive core samples was higher in the robotic group (P < 0.001). Cancer yields and complication rates were not statistically different between the two subgroups (P = 0.557 and P = 0.172, respectively).

conclusionThe robotic needle-guidance template helps accurate placement of biopsy needles in MRI-guided core biopsy of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Fiducial MarkersAgedAged, 80 and overEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalMaleMiddle AgedPerineumProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsRoboticsSensitivity and SpecificityMRI-guidanceprostate cancerrobotic devicetransperineal biopsy

Identifiers

PMID25263213
PMCPMC4376663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.