Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25263206›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2014

Trans-spinal direct current stimulation modifies spinal cord excitability through synaptic and axonal mechanisms.

Zaghloul Ahmed

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03080454 (The Effect of Treatment With the PathMaker Myoregulator Neuromodulation System Incorporating Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03080454 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Treatment With the PathMaker Myoregulator Neuromodulation System Incorporating Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Patients With Severe Hand Spasticity After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwell HealthRan2016 to 2018Enrolled26ConditionsStroke, Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Hemiparesis, Spasticity as Sequela of StrokeArmssham Doublestim, anodal Doublestim
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neuropathology of vitamin BFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zaghloul AhmedDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Staten Island for Developmental Neuroscience, the College of Staten Island, Staten IslandNew York, New York Graduate Center/The City University of New York, New York, New York.
College of Staten Island · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinal cord is extremely complex. Therefore, trans-spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is expected to produce a multitude of neurophysiological changes. Here, we asked how tsDCS differentially affects synaptic and nonsynaptic transmission. We investigated the effects of tsDCS on synaptically mediated responses by stimulating the medullary longitudinal fascicle and recording responses in the sciatic nerve and triceps and tibialis anterior muscles. Response amplitude was increased during cathodal-tsDCS (c-tsDCS), but reduced during anodal-tsDCS (a-tsDCS). After-effects were dependent on the frequency of the test stimulation. c-tsDCS-reduced responses evoked by low-frequency (0.5 Hz) test stimulation and increased responses evoked by high-frequency (400 Hz) test stimulation. a-tsDCS had opposite effects. During and after c-tsDCS, excitability of the lateral funiculus tract (LFT) and dorsal root fibers was increased. However, a-tsDCS caused a complex response, reducing the excitability of LFT and increasing dorsal root fiber responses. Local DC application on the sciatic nerve showed that the effects of DC on axonal excitability were dependent on polarity, duration of stimulation, temporal profile (during vs. after stimulation), orientation of the current direction relative to the axon and relative to the direction of action potential propagation, distance from the DC electrode, and the local environment of the nervous tissue. Collectively, these results indicate that synaptic as well as axonal mechanisms might play a role in tsDCS-induced effects. Therefore, this study identified many factors that should be considered in interpreting results of DCS and in designing tsDCS-based interventions.

Indexed as

Direct currentexcitabilitytrans‐spinal

Identifiers

PMID25263206
PMCPMC4270225
OpenAlexW2114792780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.