ArticleEnvironmental health and toxicology2014
Ordinary kriging approach to predicting long-term particulate matter concentrations in seven major Korean cities.
Article in Environmental health and toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Urban Air Quality from Mobile Sensors Using Spatio-Temporal Geostatistics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Combination of data-driven models and interpolation technique to develop of PM10 map for Hanoi, Vietnam.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Towards an integrated framework for air quality monitoring and exposure estimation-a review.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2018Review
- Estimating the spatial risk of tuberculosis distribution in Gurage zone, southern Ethiopia: a geostatistical kriging approach.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Spatiotemporal analysis for the effect of ambient particulate matter on cause-specific respiratory mortality in Beijing, China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016Article
- Computation of geographic variables for air pollution prediction models in South Korea.Environmental health and toxicology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCohort studies of associations between air pollution and health have used exposure prediction approaches to estimate individual-level concentrations. A common prediction method used in Korean cohort studies is ordinary kriging. In this study, performance of ordinary kriging models for long-term particulate matter less than or equal to 10 μm in diameter (PM10) concentrations in seven major Korean cities was investigated with a focus on spatial prediction ability.
methodsWe obtained hourly PM10 data for 2010 at 226 urban-ambient monitoring sites in South Korea and computed annual average PM10 concentrations at each site. Given the annual averages, we developed ordinary kriging prediction models for each of the seven major cities and for the entire country by using an exponential covariance reference model and a maximum likelihood estimation method. For model evaluation, cross-validation was performed and mean square error and R-squared (R(2)) statistics were computed.
resultsMean annual average PM10 concentrations in the seven major cities ranged between 45.5 and 66.0 μg/m(3) (standard deviation=2.40 and 9.51 μg/m(3), respectively). Cross-validated R(2) values in Seoul and Busan were 0.31 and 0.23, respectively, whereas the other five cities had R(2) values of zero. The national model produced a higher crossvalidated R(2) (0.36) than those for the city-specific models.
conclusionsIn general, the ordinary kriging models performed poorly for the seven major cities and the entire country of South Korea, but the model performance was better in the national model. To improve model performance, future studies should examine different prediction approaches that incorporate PM10 source characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.