ArticleGenome biology2014
DNA copy number evolution in Drosophila cell lines.
Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 70 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
70 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dosage compensation defects due to roX RNA loss are rescued by recalibration of X/autosome stoichiometry.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Nanopore-based sequencing of active DNA replication reveals key principles of metazoan replication dynamics.Science advances · 2026Article
- Inhibition of autophagy as a novel treatment for neurofibromatosis type 1 tumors.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Endocytosed dsRNAs induce lysosomal membrane permeabilization that allows cytosolic dsRNA translocation for Drosophila RNAi responses.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Effects of Arboviral Infections on Transposable Element Transcript Levels in Aedes aegypti.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Physical interaction between MSL2 and CLAMP assures direct cooperativity and prevents competition at composite binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Article
- Next-generation large-scale binary protein interaction network for Drosophila melanogaster.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Local assembly of long reads enables phylogenomics of transposable elements in a polyploid cell line.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- NetREX-CF integrates incomplete transcription factor data with gene expression to reconstruct gene regulatory networks.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Ongoing transposition in cell culture reveals the phylogeny of diverse Drosophila S2 sublines.Genetics · 2022Article
- Establishment and a comparative transcriptomic analysis of a male-specific cell line from the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Transposon activity, local duplications and propagation of structural variants across haplotypes drive the evolution of the Drosophila S2 cell line.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Chloride oscillation in pacemaker neurons regulates circadian rhythms through a chloride-sensing WNK kinase signaling cascade.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- Protective capacity of carotenoid trans-astaxanthin in rotenone-induced toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A novel transposable element-based authentication protocol for Drosophila cell lines.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Application of the 3C Method to Study the Developmental Genes inFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- An explainable artificial intelligence approach for decoding the enhancer histone modifications code and identification of novel enhancers in Drosophila.Genome biology · 2021Article
- A cis-regulatory element promoting increased transcription at low temperature in cultured ectothermic Drosophila cells.BMC genomics · 2021Article
10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
20 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStructural rearrangements of the genome resulting in genic imbalance due to copy number change are often deleterious at the organismal level, but are common in immortalized cell lines and tumors, where they may be an advantage to cells. In order to explore the biological consequences of copy number changes in the Drosophila genome, we resequenced the genomes of 19 tissue-culture cell lines and generated RNA-Seq profiles.
resultsOur work revealed dramatic duplications and deletions in all cell lines. We found three lines of evidence indicating that copy number changes were due to selection during tissue culture. First, we found that copy numbers correlated to maintain stoichiometric balance in protein complexes and biochemical pathways, consistent with the gene balance hypothesis. Second, while most copy number changes were cell line-specific, we identified some copy number changes shared by many of the independent cell lines. These included dramatic recurrence of increased copy number of the PDGF/VEGF receptor, which is also over-expressed in many cancer cells, and of bantam, an anti-apoptosis miRNA. Third, even when copy number changes seemed distinct between lines, there was strong evidence that they supported a common phenotypic outcome. For example, we found that proto-oncogenes were over-represented in one cell line (S2-DRSC), whereas tumor suppressor genes were under-represented in another (Kc167).
conclusionOur study illustrates how genome structure changes may contribute to selection of cell lines in vitro. This has implications for other cell-level natural selection progressions, including tumorigenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.