Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25262759›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2014

DNA copy number evolution in Drosophila cell lines.

Hangnoh Lee, C Joel McManus, Dong-Yeon Cho, Matthew Eaton, Fioranna Renda, Maria Patrizia Somma, Lucy Cherbas, Gemma May, Sara Powell, Dayu Zhang and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Hangnoh Lee
C Joel McManus
Dong-Yeon Cho
Matthew Eaton
Fioranna Renda
Maria Patrizia Somma
Lucy Cherbas
Gemma May
Sara Powell
Dayu Zhang
Lijun Zhan
Alissa Resch
Justen Andrews
Susan E Celniker
Peter Cherbas
Teresa M Przytycka
Maurizio Gatti
Brian Oliver
Brenton Graveley
David MacAlpine
Indiana University Bloomington · USDuke Medical Center · USUConn Health · USCarnegie Mellon University · USNational Institutes of Health · USSapienza University of Rome · ITInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology · ITLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USNational Center for Biotechnology Information · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · US

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
Drosophila Functional GenomicsZIADK015600 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI OLIVER, BRIAN · 2009 to 2025
$23.9M
Comprehensive characterization of the Drosophila transcriptomeU01HG004271 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI CELNIKER, SUSAN E · 2007 to 2011
$18.4M
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Training ProgramT32GM071340 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MAGWENE, PAUL MITAARI · 2005 to 2020
$3.3M
The Systematic Identification and Analysis of Replication Origins in DrosophilaU01HG004279 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MACALPINE, DAVID M · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NHGRI NIH HHS HG004279NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004271NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004279NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM071340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructural rearrangements of the genome resulting in genic imbalance due to copy number change are often deleterious at the organismal level, but are common in immortalized cell lines and tumors, where they may be an advantage to cells. In order to explore the biological consequences of copy number changes in the Drosophila genome, we resequenced the genomes of 19 tissue-culture cell lines and generated RNA-Seq profiles.

resultsOur work revealed dramatic duplications and deletions in all cell lines. We found three lines of evidence indicating that copy number changes were due to selection during tissue culture. First, we found that copy numbers correlated to maintain stoichiometric balance in protein complexes and biochemical pathways, consistent with the gene balance hypothesis. Second, while most copy number changes were cell line-specific, we identified some copy number changes shared by many of the independent cell lines. These included dramatic recurrence of increased copy number of the PDGF/VEGF receptor, which is also over-expressed in many cancer cells, and of bantam, an anti-apoptosis miRNA. Third, even when copy number changes seemed distinct between lines, there was strong evidence that they supported a common phenotypic outcome. For example, we found that proto-oncogenes were over-represented in one cell line (S2-DRSC), whereas tumor suppressor genes were under-represented in another (Kc167).

conclusionOur study illustrates how genome structure changes may contribute to selection of cell lines in vitro. This has implications for other cell-level natural selection progressions, including tumorigenesis.

Indexed as

Cell LineEvolution, MolecularGene DosageAnimalsCell SurvivalDNADrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenetic FitnessGenetic VariationMaleMicroRNAsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesSelection, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAbantam microRNA, DrosophilaDNADrosophila ProteinsMicroRNAsPvr protein, DrosophilaReceptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25262759
PMCPMC4289277
OpenAlexW2118826701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.