ArticleExperimental brain research2015
Insular infarct size but not levosimendan influenced myocardial injury triggered by cerebral ischemia in rats.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Value of NT-proBNP for Functional Outcome of Ischemic Stroke Without Cardiac Disease: A Prospective, Observational Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Trial
- Stroke-heart syndrome: current progress and future outlook.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Emerging Strategies and Effective Prevention Measures for Investigating the Association Between Stroke and Sudden Cardiac Fatality.Current cardiology reviews · 2024Review
- The Heart Is at Risk: Understanding Stroke-Heart-Brain Interactions with Focus on Neurogenic Stress Cardiomyopathy-A Review.Journal of stroke · 2023Review
- Stroke-Heart Syndrome: Recent Advances and Challenges.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral injuries can trigger stress-related cardiomyopathy. The extent of cerebral injury and the involvement of the insular cortex influence the incidence and extent of myocardial injury (MI), and drugs with proven neuroprotective and cardioprotective properties such as levosimendan might be beneficial. This hypothesis was addressed in a rat model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Transient brain ischemia was induced for 60 min by intraluminal occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in 40 male Wistar rats. Treatment with levosimendan (24 µg/kg) was started briefly before reperfusion. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded and cerebral and MI quantified after 24 h. Levosimendan treatment significantly reduced cerebral infarct size in the cortex, but not in the striatal and insular regions. However, its effects on survival (28 vs. 45%), incidence of MI (8 vs. 33%) as indicated by a troponin I (sTnI) threshold of 4.8 µg/L and large insular infarcts of ≥10 mm(3) (23 vs. 50%) failed to reach statistical significance. Blood pressure demonstrated significant differences related to insular infarct size during reperfusion. Levosimendan demonstrated no relevant effects on markers of MI (sTnI = 1.5 ± 2.8 vs. 5.3 ± 7.2 µg/L, P = 0.121). Insular infarct size could be identified as the only predictor of MI (odds ratio = 1.86, P = 0.037). In conclusion, the current investigation confirmed insular infarct size as a predictor of MI and source of hemodynamic compromise, but failed to demonstrate an effect of levosimendan on MI trigged by brain ischemia. A hardly protectable insular region might explain this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.