Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25262567›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2014

A chance to stop and breathe: participants' experiences in the North American Opiate Medication Initiative clinical trial.

Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes, Kirsten Marchand, Kurt Lock, Jill Chettiar, David C Marsh, Suzanne Brissette, Aslam H Anis, Martin T Schechter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00175357 (North American Opiate Medication Initiative), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00175357 phase3completednot on this map

North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI): Multi-Centre, Randomized Controlled Trial of Heroin-Assisted Therapy for Treatment-Refractory Injection Opiate Users

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2005 to 2009Enrolled192ConditionsOpiate AddictionArmsMethadone, Diamorphine hydrochloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Eugenia Oviedo-JoekesCentre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St, Paul's Hospital, 575- 1081 Burrard St,, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada. eugenia@cheos.ubc.ca.
Kirsten Marchand
Kurt Lock
Jill Chettiar
David C Marsh
Suzanne Brissette
Aslam H Anis
Martin T Schechter
St. Paul's Hospital · CACentre for Advancing Health Outcomes · CACentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAProvidence Health Care · CASt. Paul's Co-educational College · CNUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI) clinical trial compared the effectiveness of injectable diacetylmorphine (DAM) or hydromorphone (HDM) to oral methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). This study aimed to determine participants' perceptions of treatment delivered in NAOMI.

methodsA qualitative sub-study was conducted with 29 participants (12 female): 18 (62.1%) received injectable DAM or HDM and 11 (37.9%) received MMT. A phenomenological theoretical framework was used. Semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was used over successive phases and was driven by the semantic meanings of the data.

resultsParticipants receiving injectable medications suggested that the supervised delivery model was stringent but provided valuable stability to their lives. Females discussed the adjustment required for the clinical setting, while males focused on the challenging clinic schedule and its impact on employment abilities. Participants receiving MMT described disappointment with being randomized to this treatment; however, positive aspects, including the quick titration time and availability of auxiliary services, were also discussed.

conclusionTreatment with injectable DAM (or HDM) is preferred by participants and considered effective in reducing the burden of opioid dependency. Engaging patients in research regarding their perceptions of treatment provides a comprehensive assessment of treatment needs and barriers. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT00175357.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeroinHumansHydromorphoneInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMethadoneNorth AmericaOpioid-Related DisordersOutcome Assessment, Health CareResearch DesignYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidHeroinHydromorphoneMethadone

Identifiers

PMID25262567
PMCPMC4181618
OpenAlexW2002315688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.