SynthesisThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2015
Long working hours, socioeconomic status, and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data from 222 120 individuals.
Synthesis in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
123 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The Effect of Long Working Hours and Overtime on Occupational Health: A Meta-Analysis of Evidence from 1998 to 2018.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Pooled it
- Long Working Hours and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2018Pooled it
- Risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus: An exposure-wide umbrella review of meta-analyses.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Workplace bullying and violence as risk factors for type 2 diabetes: a multicohort study and meta-analysis.Diabetologia · 2018Pooled it
- Job insecurity and risk of diabetes: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016Pooled it
- Development of a scalable weight loss intervention for low-income workers through adaptation of interactive obesity treatment approach (iOTA).BMC public health · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Challenges and barriers in managing Type 2 diabetes: insights from a qualitative study of patients' experiences at a university hospital in Qassim, Saudi Arabia.Global health action · 2026Article
- MASLD prevalence, incidence and global aspects.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Association between shift work patterns and the incidence of prediabetes and diabetes among night shift workers: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- Hypertension in steelworkers: a global systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and associated factors.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Review
- How do organisations promote the nutritional health of food manufacturing employees? A scoping review and industry survey.Public health nutrition · 2026Article
- Mapping neighbourhood-level drivers of type 2 diabetes for precision public health using predictive and causal machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with adult diabetes mellitus in the adult population of Bunia, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study.The Pan African medical journal · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the implementation of workplace-based health interventions for non-communicable disease prevention: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Changes in shift patterns due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective cohort study of the intensive care nursing staff in hospitals in Stockholm.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Income-related inequalities in the association of obesity and periodontal disease: a register-based cross-sectional analysis in the Tokyo metropolitan districts.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Long Working Hours and Dyslipidemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Safety and health at work · 2025Review
63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWorking long hours might have adverse health effects, but whether this is true for all socioeconomic status groups is unclear. In this meta-analysis stratified by socioeconomic status, we investigated the role of long working hours as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes.
methodsWe identified four published studies through a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase up to April 30, 2014. Study inclusion criteria were English-language publication; prospective design (cohort study); investigation of the effect of working hours or overtime work; incident diabetes as an outcome; and relative risks, odds ratios, or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs, or sufficient information to calculate these estimates. Additionally, we used unpublished individual-level data from 19 cohort studies from the Individual-Participant-Data Meta-analysis in Working-Populations Consortium and international open-access data archives. Effect estimates from published and unpublished data from 222 120 men and women from the USA, Europe, Japan, and Australia were pooled with random-effects meta-analysis.
findingsDuring 1·7 million person-years at risk, 4963 individuals developed diabetes (incidence 29 per 10 000 person-years). The minimally adjusted summary risk ratio for long (≥55 h per week) compared with standard working hours (35-40 h) was 1·07 (95% CI 0·89-1·27, difference in incidence three cases per 10 000 person-years) with significant heterogeneity in study-specific estimates (I(2)=53%, p=0·0016). In an analysis stratified by socioeconomic status, the association between long working hours and diabetes was evident in the low socioeconomic status group (risk ratio 1·29, 95% CI 1·06-1·57, difference in incidence 13 per 10 000 person-years, I(2)=0%, p=0·4662), but was null in the high socioeconomic status group (1·00, 95% CI 0·80-1·25, incidence difference zero per 10 000 person-years, I(2)=15%, p=0·2464). The association in the low socioeconomic status group was robust to adjustment for age, sex, obesity, and physical activity, and remained after exclusion of shift workers.
interpretationIn this meta-analysis, the link between longer working hours and type 2 diabetes was apparent only in individuals in the low socioeconomic status groups.
fundingMedical Research Council, European Union New and Emerging Risks in Occupational Safety and Health research programme, Finnish Work Environment Fund, Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Research, German Social Accident Insurance, Danish National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Academy of Finland, Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (Netherlands), Economic and Social Research Council, US National Institutes of Health, and British Heart Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.