Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25262312›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2014

Hospital admissions for severe mental illness in England: changes in equity of utilisation at the small area level between 2006 and 2010.

Jonathan White, Nils Gutacker, Rowena Jacobs, Anne Mason

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Restructuring Crisis Response Programs as Civilian-Led: A Scoping Review.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan WhiteCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jonathan.white@dh.gsi.gov.uk.
Nils GutackerCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: nils.gutacker@york.ac.uk.
Rowena JacobsCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: rowena.jacobs@york.ac.uk.
Anne MasonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom. Electronic address: anne.mason@york.ac.uk.
University of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/1011/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe Mental Illness (SMI) encompasses a range of chronic conditions including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and psychoses. Patients with SMI often require inpatient psychiatric care. Despite equity being a key objective in the English National Health Service (NHS) and in many other health care systems worldwide, little is known about the socio-economic equity of hospital care utilisation for patients with SMI and how it has changed over time. This analysis seeks to address that gap in the evidence base. We exploit a five-year (2006-2010) panel dataset of admission rates at small area level (n=162,410). The choice of control variables was informed by a systematic literature search. To assess changes in socio-economic equity of utilisation, OLS-based standardisation was first used to conduct analysis of discrete deprivation groups. Geographical inequity was then illustrated by plotting standardised and crude admission rates at local purchaser level. Lastly, formal statistical tests for changes in socio-economic equity of utilisation were applied to a continuous measure of deprivation using pooled negative binomial regression analysis, adjusting for a range of risk factors. Our results suggest that one additional percentage point of area income deprivation is associated with a 1.5% (p<0.001) increase in admissions for SMI after controlling for population size, age, sex, prevalence of SMI in the local population, as well as other need and supply factors. This finding is robust to sensitivity analyses, suggesting that a pro-poor inequality in utilisation exists for SMI-related inpatient services. One possible explanation is that the supply or quality of primary, community or social care for people with mental health problems is suboptimal in deprived areas. Although there is some evidence that inequity has reduced over time, the changes are small and not always robust to sensitivity analyses.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth ServicesHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionRegression AnalysisSeverity of Illness IndexSmall-Area AnalysisEnglandHealthcare disparities/trendsHospitals/utilizationMental health servicesRegression analysisSmall-area analysisSocioeconomic factorsState Medicine/Organization & Administration

Identifiers

PMID25262312
PMCPMC4225455
OpenAlexW2010689649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.