Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25262192›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2015

Oral gabapentin and intradermal injection of lidocaine: is there any role in the treatment of moderate/severe tinnitus?

Francesco Ciodaro, Valentina Katia Mannella, Giovanni Cammaroto, Lilla Bonanno, Francesco Galletti, Bruno Galletti

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review of Pharmacotherapy for Tinnitus.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco CiodaroDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98100, Messina, Italy.
Valentina Katia Mannella
Giovanni Cammaroto
Lilla Bonanno
Francesco Galletti
Bruno Galletti
University of Messina · ITCentro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of our work is to evaluate recovery induced by gabapentin alone and in association with intradermal infiltration of lidocaine in patients affected by moderate/severe tinnitus. Seventy-two patients suffering from moderate/severe unilateral non-pulsatile subjective tinnitus were enrolled. Severity and behaviour of tinnitus were assessed by Tinnitus handicap Index (THI) on the 8th, 22nd and 36th days from onset of therapy, and on the 3rd and 6th month after the end of therapy in patients treated with oral gabapentin (Group I), oral gabapentin and intradermal injection of lidocaine (Group II), and placebo (Group III) Significant differences in THI scores from the 8th day of therapy to the 22nd (p < 0.0001) and from the 22nd day to the 36th (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0004, respectively) were found in Group I and Group II. In Group II, another relevant decrease of THI scores from the 36th day of therapy to 3 months from the end of treatment (p = 0.0004) was found. A significant difference in THI scores between Group I and Group II was found after 8 days of treatment (p = 0.05) with a more relevant decrease registered in Group II; significant differences were also found in THI scores between Group I and Group III after 8 days of treatment (p = 0.01), with a more relevant decrease registered in Group III; significant differences in THI scores between Group II and Group III were found after 36 days of treatment (p = 0.009), 3 and 6 months after the end of therapy (p = 0.005 and p = 0.007, respectively), with a more relevant decrease registered in Group II. In conclusion, the use of gabapentin associated to lidocaine seems to be superior to placebo and gabapentin in relieving tinnitus.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAminesAnesthetics, LocalAnticonvulsantsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansInjections, IntradermalLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAminesAnesthetics, LocalAnticonvulsantsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID25262192
OpenAlexW1985201074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.