Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25261979›Full record

SynthesisPituitary2015

Preoperative somatostatin analogues versus direct transsphenoidal surgery for newly-diagnosed acromegaly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis using the GRADE system.

V S Nunes, J M S Correa, M E S Puga, E M K Silva, C L Boguszewski

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pituitary, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Effects of somatostatin analog treatment on cardiovascular parameters in patients with acromegaly: A systematic review.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V S NunesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Botucatu Medical School, Sao Paulo State University/UNESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil, vsnunes@fmb.unesp.br.
J M S Correa
M E S Puga
E M K Silva
C L Boguszewski
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWhether the preoperative use of somatostatin analogues (SA) improves surgical outcomes in acromegaly is still a matter of debate.

objectiveWe conducted a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials that compared the short-term outcomes of preoperative use of SA (Pre-SA) with direct TSS (No-SA) for the treatment of newly diagnosed acromegaly.

methodsEmbase, Pubmed, Lilacs, and Central Cochrane were used as our data sources. The primary outcomes were no need for any adjuvant treatment 3 months after surgery, based on biochemical results (GH nadir after OGTT <1 μg/L and normal IGF-1 for age and gender), quality of life and mortality. The included trials were analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

resultsA total of 2.099 references were identified and two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts. From the 14 potentially eligible studies, four were included and ten were excluded due to lack of randomization or different outcomes. A pool of 261 patients was randomly assigned to Pre-SA or No-SA. Meta-analysis of IGF1 normalization showed a significant difference in favor of Pre-SA (RR 2.47; 95% CI 1.66, 3.77). Adding a GH nadir on OGTT ≤1 μg/L, we found a RR of 2.15 (95% CI 1.39, 3.33). Quality of evidence for no need of adjuvant postoperative treatment was moderate, but for improving quality of life was very low and for mortality was absent.

conclusionPre-SA increases the chance of biochemical control of acromegaly 3 months after TSS in patients harboring GH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyNeurosurgical ProceduresAdenomaAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalChemotherapy, AdjuvantGlucose Tolerance TestGrowth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary AdenomaHuman Growth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IOctreotidePeptides, CyclicPreoperative CareQuality of LifeSomatostatinAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalHuman Growth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor IlanreotideOctreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID25261979
OpenAlexW1970109874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.