Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25261595›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2014

Glioma-associated microglia and macrophages/monocytes display distinct electrophysiological properties and do not communicate via gap junctions.

Nadine Richter, Stefan Wendt, Petya B Georgieva, Dolores Hambardzumyan, Christiane Nolte, Helmut Kettenmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadine RichterMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Roessle Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Stefan WendtMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Roessle Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Petya B GeorgievaMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Roessle Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Dolores HambardzumyanDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Christiane NolteMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Roessle Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Helmut KettenmannMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine, Robert Roessle Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: kettenmann@mdc-berlin.de.
Max Delbrück Center · DECleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

Non-neoplastic cell types dictate gliomagenesis andU01CA160882 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HAMBARDZUMYAN, DOLORES, HOLLAND, ERIC C. · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA160882NCI NIH HHS U01CA160882-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both brain-resident microglia and peripheral macrophages/monocytes infiltrate into glioma and promote glioma growth. In the present study we analyzed coupling and membrane currents in glioma-associated microglia and macrophages/monocytes and compared this to control and stab wound-associated microglia. Using the Cx3cr1(GFP/wt)Ccr2(RFP/wt) knock-in mouse line, we distinguished membrane currents of glioma-associated microglia and macrophages/monocytes in acute brain slices prepared 14-16 days after inoculation of GL261 glioma cells. The current profile of microglia showed inward rectifying currents reminiscent of an intermediate activation state when compared to other disease models or cell culture. Macrophages/monocytes showed a higher specific outward conductance and a significantly lower capacitance indicative of a smaller membrane area than microglia. As controls, we also recorded currents from control microglia and stab wound-associated microglia. Since there are reports of microglial coupling in vitro, we injected biocytin into these cells and analyzed for cell coupling after fixing the slices and processed for biocytin labeling with Cy3-conjugated-Streptavidin. Neither control microglia nor glioma-associated microglia and macrophages/monocytes nor stab wound-associated microglia showed any sign of coupling. Moreover, performing qRT-PCR revealed that no connexin43 was detectable on isolated and sorted glioma-associated microglia and macrophages/monocytes, indicating that these cells are not part of a coupled network.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorConnexin 43Gap JunctionsGliomaMacrophagesMembrane PotentialsMiceMicrogliaMonocytesNeoplasm TransplantationPatch-Clamp TechniquesConnexin 43ElectrophysiologyGap junctionsGliomaGlioma-associated macrophages/monocytesGlioma-associated microglia

Identifiers

PMID25261595
PMCPMC4274622
OpenAlexW2094728425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.