Trial reportCirculation2014
Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: insights from PREVENT IV.
Trial report in Circulation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00042081 (A Phase III, Multi-Center Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Ex Vivo Treatment With CGT003 of Coronary Vein Grafts in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Procedures), which is not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Multi-Center Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Ex Vivo Treatment With CGT003 of Coronary Vein Grafts in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Procedures
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Conventional hybrid coronary vs. robot-assisted minimally invasive direct revascularization: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Sex differences in saphenous vein graft patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Clinical comparison between Er: YAG and CO2 laser in treatment of oral tumorous lesions: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- The short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stent vs bare-metal stent in saphenous vein graft disease: An updated meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials.Clinical cardiology · 2018Pooled it
- No-touch vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: a registry-based randomized clinical trial.European heart journal · 2025Trial
- The expansion of no-touch harvesting sequential vein graft after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Long-term remodeling of compliance matched tissue engineered vascular grafts is sex specific.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Article
- Metabolic Signatures in Pericardial Fluid and Serum Are Associated with Long-Term Restenosis After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Expert Review of the Strategies to Optimize Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Small Interfering RNA Therapy Targeting the Long Noncoding RNA SMILR for Therapeutic Intervention in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Failure.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2025Article
- Coronary artery bypass grafting following Ross procedure in a patient with familial hypercholesterolemia.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Article
- Nanomedicine-based strategies for the treatment of vein graft disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Heparin and Gelatin Co-Functionalized Polyurethane Artificial Blood Vessel for Improving Anticoagulation and Biocompatibility.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nano-based perivascular intervention sustains a nine-month long-term suppression of intimal hyperplasia in vein grafts.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Construction of vascular grafts based on tissue-engineered scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Inhibition of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in a large animal preclinical arteriovenous fistula model leads to improved remodelling and reduced stenosis.Cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Unplanned postoperative catheterization during admission for coronary artery bypass grafting is neither cheap nor benign, but may rescue patients.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- In-Hospital Graft Occlusion in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients in the Early Postoperative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Exploring the Potential of Saphenous Vein Grafts Ex Vivo: A Model for Intimal Hyperplasia and Re-Endothelialization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery bypass grafting success is limited by vein graft failure (VGF). Understanding the factors associated with VGF may improve patient outcomes. METHODS AND
resultsWe examined 1828 participants in the Project of Ex Vivo Vein Graft Engineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) trial undergoing protocol-mandated follow-up angiography 12 to 18 months post-coronary artery bypass grafting or earlier clinically driven angiography. Outcomes included patient- and graft-level angiographic VGF (≥75% stenosis or occlusion). Variables were selected by using Fast False Selection Rate methodology. We examined relationships between variables and VGF in patient- and graft-level models by using logistic regression without and with generalized estimating equations. At 12 to 18 months post-coronary artery bypass grafting, 782 of 1828 (42.8%) patients had VGF, and 1096 of 4343 (25.2%) vein grafts had failed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between patients with and without VGF, although VGF patients had longer surgical times, worse target artery quality, longer graft length, and they more frequently underwent endoscopic vein harvesting. After multivariable adjustment, longer surgical duration (odds ratio per 10-minute increase, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.07), endoscopic vein harvesting (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.71), poor target artery quality (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.84), and postoperative use of clopidogrel or ticlopidine (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.69) were associated with patient-level VGF. The predicted likelihood of VGF in the graft-level model ranged from 12.1% to 63.6%.
conclusionsVGF is common and associated with patient and surgical factors. These findings may help identify patients with risk factors for VGF and inform the development of interventions to reduce VGF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00042081.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.