ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2014
[Interventional pain therapy. Results of a survey among specialized pain physicians in Germany].
Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Interventional pain treatment in Austria : Results of a survey among specialized pain therapists].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Practice of regional anesthesia for chronic pain patients in specialized pain services : A nationwide survey in Germany].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterventional pain therapy aims to treat pain which is refractory to pharmacologic and noninterventional treatment. Due to the partly lacking evidence and recommendations it remains unclear when interventional methods should be applied within the treatment pathway. This study assesses the current state of interventional methods in Germany and their leading indications comparing with the recommendations found in the literature.
methodsAn online survey was conducted among German physicians specialized in pain therapy concerning the number of interventions they perform per quarter, which supporting measures they use, and their indications for sympathetic blocks, sensory blocks, intrathecal administration, and spinal cord stimulation.
resultsA total of 109 physicians (23.5 %) participated in the survey. Blocks are most often performed on the stellate ganglion (94 %) and on the superior cervical ganglion (82 %). They are supported by anatomical landmarks and less often by imaging control. Both classic neuropathic pain diagnoses (e.g., complex regional pain syndrome) and diagnoses with a neuropathic pain component (e.g., peripheral arterial disease, tumor pain, and back pain) were considered as indications to perform interventional procedures.
conclusionAlthough there is no clear evidence on interventional procedures in the current literature, these methods are often performed by the respondents. Anatomic landmarks are most frequently used for orientation. The German pain physicians who responded consider especially neuropathic pain as an indication to perform interventional procedures for pain therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.